The Meizu M10 and Infinix Hot 9 Pro represent a common segment: the ultra-budget smartphone. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at a low price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The key differentiator lies in their chipsets – the Meizu M10 utilizes the older, but potentially more powerful, Mediatek Helio P25, while the Infinix Hot 9 Pro opts for the newer, more efficient Helio P22. This comparison will dissect these differences and determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in everyday tasks, the Meizu M10 edges out the Infinix Hot 9 Pro. Its Helio P25, despite being an older node, offers a higher clock speed and a more complex CPU configuration, translating to snappier performance. However, the Hot 9 Pro’s efficiency gains are notable for extended use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40 - LATAM | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, October | 2020, May 29. Released 2020, June 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 165 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6757T Helio P25 (16 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T880MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 10, XOS 6.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.2
2 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Purplish Red, Sea Blue | Violet, Ocean Wave |
| Models | - | X655F |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 50 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
Meizu M10
- Potentially faster CPU performance due to higher clock speeds.
- More complex CPU core configuration for burst performance.
- Potentially better image processing due to the more powerful chipset.
- Less power efficient due to the 16nm process.
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Hot 9 Pro.
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
- More power efficient due to the 12nm process.
- Better thermal management and sustained performance.
- Potentially longer battery life.
- Lower CPU clock speeds may result in slower app loading.
- Simpler CPU core configuration.
- Potentially less capable image processing.
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display prowess, and detailed display specs are unavailable. However, given their price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of information regarding brightness or color accuracy suggests neither phone will excel in outdoor visibility or color fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both models, typical for this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing. Given the market segment, expect primary sensors around 13MP. The presence of 2MP macro or depth sensors is probable, but their utility is questionable. Without specific aperture or sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P25 *may* offer slightly better image processing capabilities due to its overall higher performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu M10’s Helio P25 (MT6757T) is built on a 16nm process and features an octa-core CPU split into 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This configuration suggests a focus on burst performance. Conversely, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro’s Helio P22 (MT6762) is fabricated on a more efficient 12nm process, utilizing eight 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the P22 lacks the high-clocked cores of the P25, the smaller node size translates to improved power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling during prolonged use. The P25’s higher clock speeds will likely result in faster single-core performance, beneficial for app loading, while the P22’s efficiency will be more noticeable in sustained tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro’s Helio P22, built on a 12nm process, will inherently consume less power than the Meizu M10’s Helio P25 on the 16nm node. This efficiency advantage will translate to longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both are likely to support standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in relatively slow 0-100% charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu M10 if you need a phone that feels more responsive for basic multitasking, social media, and light gaming. The higher CPU clock speeds will be noticeable in app launch times and general fluidity. Buy the Infinix Hot 9 Pro if you prioritize battery life and sustained performance over raw speed. The 12nm process node of the Helio P22 contributes to better thermal management and potentially longer runtimes, making it ideal for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Meizu M10 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P25 can handle PUBG Mobile at low to medium settings, but expect frame drops and potential overheating during extended gaming sessions. The GPU isn't designed for sustained high performance, and the 16nm process contributes to thermal throttling. The Infinix Hot 9 Pro will likely offer a more consistent, albeit lower, frame rate due to its better thermal management.
❓ Is the power efficiency difference between the Helio P25 and P22 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 12nm Helio P22 in the Infinix Hot 9 Pro will demonstrably improve battery life compared to the 16nm Helio P25 in the Meizu M10. This difference will be most apparent during tasks like video streaming, web browsing, and prolonged social media use. Expect several extra hours of usage on the Hot 9 Pro.
❓ Which phone is better for multitasking between several apps?
The Meizu M10, with its higher clocked CPU cores, will likely handle multitasking slightly better. The faster processing speed will result in quicker app switching and reduced lag when running multiple applications simultaneously. However, the difference won't be dramatic.
