Meizu 22 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Meizu 22’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and 80W charging, despite the Meizu offering wireless charging capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 22 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 19 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 152 x 71 x 8.2 mm (5.98 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2670 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~465 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF (15cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.1, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88" | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.1, 22mm (wide), 1/2.88" | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2, Display Port (1TB only) | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3 PPS, QC4+ 66W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5510 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | - | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Meizu 22
- 66W Wireless Charging offers convenience.
- Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 provides strong performance.
- Potential for a refined software experience (Meizu FlymeOS).
- Slower wired charging (80W) compared to the competition.
- Display brightness likely lower than Xiaomi 14T Pro.
- Limited information on camera capabilities.
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging.
- Powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset.
- Bright 1228 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Wireless charging is slower at 50W.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be feature-rich but sometimes bloated.
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (needs further testing).
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Meizu 22. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the brighter display of the Xiaomi 14T Pro will offer superior visibility in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing for the Meizu 22, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Xiaomi 14T Pro will likely feature a more robust camera system. Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera hardware, and the Dimensity 9300+’s ISP capabilities are strong. The Meizu 22 may focus on computational photography, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro likely has an edge in sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 core and *three* additional Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, potentially offering a sustained performance advantage over the Meizu 22’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720). The Dimensity 9300+’s architecture suggests a greater emphasis on peak performance, while the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 aims for a balance of power and efficiency. Both are built on a 4nm process, but the core count difference is significant.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h demonstrates impressive battery endurance. While the Meizu 22’s battery capacity is unknown, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes) is a game-changer, significantly faster than the Meizu 22’s 80W wired charging. The Xiaomi 14T Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 45 minutes) compared to the Meizu 22’s 66W wireless, further solidifying its charging advantage. The Meizu 22 does offer 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature also present on the Xiaomi 14T Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 22 if you value a more balanced approach with a focus on wireless charging convenience and a potentially more refined software experience (based on Meizu’s historical approach). Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize ultimate performance, blazing-fast wired charging, and extended battery life during active use, making it ideal for power users and gamers.