Meizu 21 Note vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: Which Flagship Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 120W charging (fully charging in 19 minutes) and impressive 12:32h active use battery life outweigh the Meizu 21 Note’s established Snapdragon platform. However, those prioritizing a proven track record and potentially better software optimization might lean towards the Meizu.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 21 Note | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 16 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 21 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.9 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Flyme OS | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD3 PPS, QC4+ | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | - | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 330 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Meizu 21 Note
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Potential for optimized software experience
- Established brand reputation
- Slower 65W charging
- Limited battery life information
- Display brightness likely lower than Xiaomi
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes)
- Excellent 12:32h active use battery life
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Dimensity 9300+ is a newer platform with less software optimization
- Potential for higher thermal output under sustained load
- Brand perception may be less established than Meizu
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Meizu 21 Note. This higher brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, display technology details beyond brightness are missing for the Meizu, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel type (LTPO vs. standard OLED) impossible. The Xiaomi’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Meizu 21 Note, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (details not provided in context) with OIS, crucial for sharp, stable images. The absence of information regarding the Meizu’s sensor size and OIS capabilities makes it difficult to assess its photographic prowess. It’s safe to assume both phones will offer a range of shooting modes, but the Xiaomi’s potential for a larger sensor and advanced image processing gives it a likely advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Meizu 21 Note versus Mediatek’s Dimensity 9300+ in the Xiaomi 14T Pro. The Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and three additional Cortex-X4 cores, potentially offering a performance edge over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. The Dimensity’s all-performance core design could lead to sustained performance benefits, while the Snapdragon’s mix of performance and efficiency cores aims for a balance. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the architectural differences suggest the Xiaomi 14T Pro has the potential for higher peak performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro shines in battery and charging. Its active use score of 12:32h demonstrates excellent endurance. Crucially, it supports 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes – a significant advantage over the Meizu 21 Note’s 65W charging. The Xiaomi also offers 50W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Meizu. While the Meizu’s battery capacity is unknown, the Xiaomi’s combination of capacity and charging speed provides a superior user experience, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 21 Note if you prioritize a well-established chipset with a history of strong software support and are comfortable with 65W charging. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, extended battery life, and are willing to embrace a newer, potentially more powerful processor architecture with the Dimensity 9300+.