Meizu 20 Infinity vs. vivo X90 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the stronger recommendation. Its 80W wired charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Meizu 20 Infinity’s 65W, and the inclusion of reverse wired charging adds versatility. While software preference is subjective, vivo’s OriginOS is more widely adopted and supported.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 20 Infinity | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 30 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 12 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 73.3 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.89 x 0.32 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1368 x 3192 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~511 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 107.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Flyme 10 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 12 MP f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", PDAF, OIS, optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" | - |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD PPS, QC4 50W wireless | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Silver | Black, Red |
| Models | - | V2227A |
| Price | About 820 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
Meizu 20 Infinity
- Potentially cleaner software experience with Flyme OS
- Meizu’s unique design aesthetic
- Competitive Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Slower 65W wired charging
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Less established software support compared to vivo
vivo X90 Pro+
- Faster 80W wired charging with 33-minute full charge
- Convenient reverse wired charging
- More widely adopted and supported OriginOS
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
- Potentially higher price point
- Design may be less distinctive than Meizu
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize high-end displays, though specific details like panel type (AMOLED is assumed for both) and resolution are missing. The core performance will be similar due to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s display engine. However, the charging differences suggest potential variations in display power efficiency. Without specific brightness data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but both are expected to deliver vibrant and sharp visuals suitable for multimedia consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent, but the market positioning of both phones suggests high-quality camera systems. The vivo X90 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera array, potentially including a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, given vivo’s strong camera reputation. While both will benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP, the X90 Pro+’s potential hardware advantages could translate to superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details prevents a definitive assessment, but the X90 Pro+ has a higher probability of a more versatile and capable camera system.
Performance
Both the Meizu 20 Infinity and vivo X90 Pro+ are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be virtually identical for tasks like app launching, multitasking, and demanding games. The 4nm process node ensures excellent thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The performance difference will likely hinge on RAM configuration (not specified) and the effectiveness of each manufacturer’s cooling solution. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU will deliver a top-tier gaming experience on both devices.
Battery Life
The vivo X90 Pro+ boasts a clear advantage in charging speed with its 80W wired charging, advertised to reach 100% in 33 minutes. The Meizu 20 Infinity’s 65W wired charging, while still fast, will take longer to fully replenish the battery. Both support 50W wireless charging, offering comparable convenience. The X90 Pro+ also includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Meizu 20 Infinity, allowing it to top up other devices. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging and reverse charging capabilities of the X90 Pro+ provide a more practical user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 20 Infinity if you prioritize a potentially cleaner, more minimalist software experience with Flyme OS and appreciate Meizu’s design language. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you value faster charging speeds, the convenience of reverse wireless charging, and a more established software ecosystem with wider community support and potentially better long-term updates.