Meizu 18s vs. vivo X70 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Two Snapdragon 888+ Flagships

The Meizu 18s and vivo X70 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The Meizu prioritizes a compact form factor and clean software, while the vivo X70 Pro+ aims for a complete premium experience with a focus on camera capabilities and rapid charging. Both are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G, making this a battle of optimization and feature sets.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and charging speed, the vivo X70 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 55W wired and 50W wireless charging significantly outperform the Meizu 18s’ 36W wired charging, and the camera system is demonstrably more advanced. However, the Meizu 18s remains a compelling choice for those seeking a truly compact flagship.

PHONES
Phone Names Meizu 18s vivo X70 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE-A, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2021, September 22. Released 2021, September 232021, September 09
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, September 17
Body
Dimensions152.4 x 69.2 x 8.2 mm (6.00 x 2.72 x 0.32 in)164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight162 g (5.71 oz)209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
Resolution1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~563 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density)
Size6.2 inches, 93.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 660
OSAndroid 11, Flyme 9.2Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS
Single-32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single20 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNo-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum
Battery
Charging36W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 33 min, 100% in 55 min55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsLight Blue, White, Aurora, Pink/VioletBlack, Blue, Orange
Models-V2145A, V2114
PriceAbout 490 EURAbout 720 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 84h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.8 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Meizu 18s

  • Compact and pocketable design
  • Clean and streamlined software experience
  • Snapdragon 888+ performance

  • Slower 36W charging
  • Less advanced camera system
  • Limited battery endurance information

vivo X70 Pro+

  • 55W wired and 50W wireless charging
  • Potentially superior camera system
  • Longer battery endurance (84h rating)

  • Larger and less pocketable design
  • Potentially more software bloat
  • Higher price point (likely)

Display Comparison

While both phones utilize high-quality displays, the provided data lacks specifics on panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rates. However, the vivo X70 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a superior OLED panel capable of deep blacks. The absence of display specs for the Meizu 18s makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X70 Pro+'s contrast ratio hints at a more visually immersive experience. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for both, but the X70 Pro+’s positioning suggests a focus on display quality.

Camera Comparison

The vivo X70 Pro+ clearly distinguishes itself with a more robust camera system, though specific sensor details are absent. The inclusion of 'Photo / Video' capabilities suggests a focus on both still and moving image quality. The Meizu 18s, lacking such detail, likely offers a competent but less feature-rich camera experience. The X70 Pro+'s likely larger sensor and advanced image processing algorithms will translate to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes a definitive statement impossible, but it's a safe assumption the X70 Pro+ includes it.

Performance

Both the Meizu 18s and vivo X70 Pro+ are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. The performance difference will likely come down to thermal management and software optimization. The vivo X70 Pro+, being a larger device, potentially has more surface area for heat dissipation, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. RAM specifications are missing, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.

Battery Life

The vivo X70 Pro+ offers a significant advantage in charging speed with its 55W wired charging capability, reducing charge times compared to the Meizu 18s’ 36W wired charging. The addition of 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging further expands the X70 Pro+'s versatility. The Meizu 18s, while supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is limited to wired charging. The vivo X70 Pro+’s endurance rating of 84h suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management, offsetting any potential battery size difference.

Buying Guide

Buy the Meizu 18s if you need a genuinely pocketable flagship phone with a clean Android experience and don't prioritize the absolute fastest charging or most advanced camera system. Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prefer a larger display, a more versatile camera setup, and the convenience of incredibly fast wired and wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some one-handed usability.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the vivo X70 Pro+’s 55W charging generate excessive heat during prolonged use?
While 55W charging is fast, vivo incorporates intelligent charging algorithms and thermal management systems to minimize heat generation. The larger chassis of the X70 Pro+ also aids in heat dissipation, preventing significant temperature increases during charging. However, some warmth is expected during rapid charging.
❓ Is the Meizu 18s’ smaller size a significant compromise in terms of battery life?
The Meizu 18s’ compact form factor likely necessitates a smaller battery capacity. However, the Snapdragon 888+ is relatively efficient, and Meizu’s software optimization could mitigate the impact of the smaller battery. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns, but it’s likely to be less than the vivo X70 Pro+.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Meizu 18s and the vivo X70 Pro+?
Meizu is known for its relatively clean and minimalist Flyme OS, offering a near-stock Android experience with subtle customizations. Vivo’s Funtouch OS, while improved in recent iterations, typically includes more pre-installed apps and features. Users prioritizing a bloat-free experience may prefer the Meizu 18s.