Meizu 18s vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6 Pro emerges as the stronger overall choice. Its superior camera system, powered by the Google Tensor chip, and longer software support outweigh the Meizu 18s’s compact size and slightly faster charging. However, users prioritizing a smaller phone and unadulterated Android performance will find the Meizu 18s compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18s | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22. Released 2021, September 23 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.4 x 69.2 x 8.2 mm (6.00 x 2.72 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~563 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 93.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9.2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 36W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 33 min, 100% in 55 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Light Blue, White, Aurora, Pink/Violet | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 490 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 18s
- Compact and pocketable design
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Faster wired charging (36W)
- Limited camera capabilities compared to Pixel 6 Pro
- Lack of wireless charging
- Software support may be shorter
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera system with Google Tensor AI
- Long-term software support from Google
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Larger and less pocketable design
- Slower wired charging (23W)
- Google's software customizations may not appeal to all
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a larger display and a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, offering excellent visibility outdoors. While the Meizu 18s’s display specs aren’t provided, its smaller form factor suggests a more intimate viewing experience. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a true OLED panel, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate information for the Meizu 18s is a drawback, as the Pixel 6 Pro likely benefits from a smoother scrolling experience with its variable refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is its standout feature, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor chip, are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The Meizu 18s likely offers a competent camera experience, but it won’t match the Pixel 6 Pro’s ability to consistently capture stunning images in challenging conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures on the Meizu 18s makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on computational photography gives it a clear advantage.
Performance
Both phones utilize a 5nm process, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Meizu 18s features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G, with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. The Pixel 6 Pro employs Google’s Tensor chip, featuring a dual Cortex-X1 setup at 2.80 GHz. While clock speed isn’t everything, the Snapdragon 888+ is known for its strong sustained performance and gaming capabilities. The Tensor chip prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The Pixel 6 Pro’s CPU architecture, with two X1 cores, could offer advantages in multi-threaded workloads, but the Meizu 18s likely holds an edge in raw graphical power. Both utilize Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency, but RAM speed (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR5x) isn't specified for either device, making a direct comparison difficult.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Meizu 18s). However, charging speeds differ significantly. The Meizu 18s supports 36W wired charging, reaching 80% in 33 minutes and 100% in 55 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro offers slower 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) but compensates with 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging – features absent on the Meizu 18s. The Pixel 6 Pro’s wireless charging capabilities provide added convenience, while the Meizu 18s’s faster wired charging offers quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 18s if you need a truly compact flagship experience, value a clean, near-stock Android build without Google’s heavy AI processing, and prioritize raw CPU/GPU performance for demanding tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a larger display, a class-leading camera system with advanced computational photography features, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google for an extended period.