Meizu 18s Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Meizu 18s Pro boasts a slightly more powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset and faster charging speeds, including wireless. However, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro offers significantly faster wired charging (65W) and potentially a more competitive price. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: raw power and wireless charging versus rapid wired charging and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18s Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - ROW | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22. Released 2021, September 23 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 73 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.87 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 72.9 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.87 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9.2 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 130˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.65”, 0.7µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min 40W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Gray | Dream black, Crystal blue, Gold |
| Models | M192Q | A2023G, A2023 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Meizu 18s Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- 40W Wireless Charging
- Potentially refined Flyme OS
- Faster 40W Wired Charging
- Potentially higher price
- Software updates may be less frequent compared to ZTE
ZTE Axon 40 Pro
- 65W Super-Fast Wired Charging
- Potentially more competitive price
- Strong camera system (rumored)
- Reliable Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Slightly less powerful chipset than the 888+
- Wireless charging is slower (40W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, likely with high refresh rates (assumed 120Hz). The Meizu 18s Pro likely has a slightly higher resolution or better color accuracy due to Meizu's historical focus on display quality. However, the Axon 40 Pro might offer a larger screen size. We'll need to confirm exact specs for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
The ZTE Axon 40 Pro is rumored to have a strong camera system, potentially with a high-resolution main sensor. Meizu 18s Pro likely features a versatile triple-camera setup. Image quality will depend on software processing and sensor size, making a direct comparison challenging without detailed camera specifications and sample photos. Both are expected to offer good low-light performance.
Performance
The Meizu 18s Pro's Snapdragon 888+ holds a performance edge over the Axon 40 Pro's Snapdragon 870. While the 870 is still a very capable chip, the 888+ offers a noticeable boost in CPU and GPU performance, especially in demanding games and multitasking scenarios. Expect smoother performance and faster app loading times on the Meizu.
Battery Life
The Meizu 18s Pro has a 40W wired and wireless charging, while the ZTE Axon 40 Pro shines with its 65W wired charging. This means the Axon 40 Pro will charge significantly faster when plugged in. Battery capacity is likely similar between the two devices, around 4500-5000 mAh.
Buying Guide
The Meizu 18s Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, enjoy wireless charging, and appreciate a potentially more refined software experience (Meizu's Flyme OS). The ZTE Axon 40 Pro is a great choice for those seeking a flagship experience with incredibly fast wired charging and a focus on value for money.