Meizu 18s Pro vs. Xiaomi Poco F5: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers exceptional value with its blazing-fast charging, bright display, and efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. The Meizu 18s Pro boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 888+ but struggles to match the Poco F5's overall package, especially considering the price difference. The Poco F5 is the clear winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18s Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 22. Released 2021, September 23 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 73 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.87 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9.2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 130˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.65”, 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min 40W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Gray | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | M192Q | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 610 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
Meizu 18s Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Premium design and build quality
- Wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging
- Higher price
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less optimized software
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent value for money
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast 67W charging
- Long battery life
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Less premium design
- Camera may not match flagship competitors
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown. While the Meizu 18s Pro has a good display, the Poco F5's 963 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a significantly more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Both offer smooth refresh rates, but the Poco F5's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. The Meizu 18s Pro likely has a more sophisticated camera system on paper, but the Poco F5's camera is surprisingly capable, producing detailed and vibrant photos. Low-light performance is likely better on the Meizu, but the Poco F5 offers a more consistent experience overall. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The Meizu 18s Pro's Snapdragon 888+ holds a theoretical edge in raw processing power. However, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is incredibly efficient and delivers excellent real-world performance, often closing the gap. For most users, the Poco F5's performance will be more than adequate, and its efficiency is a bonus.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in battery life and charging. Its endurance rating of 118h is impressive, and the 67W wired charging gets you to 100% in just 46 minutes. The Meizu 18s Pro's 40W charging is slower, and its battery life, while decent, doesn't match the Poco F5's longevity.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Meizu 18s Pro? Users prioritizing raw processing power and a more premium design, and are willing to pay a premium for it. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Budget-conscious buyers seeking a fantastic display, fast charging, and excellent performance for everyday tasks and gaming.