Meizu 18 vs. vivo X60 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a pocketable design and a clean Android experience, the Meizu 18 is the better choice. However, the vivo X60 Pro+ excels in camera performance and offers significantly faster 55W charging, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and those who demand all-day battery life with quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18 | vivo X60 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 03. Released 2021, March 08 | 2021, January 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.4 x 69.2 x 8.2 mm (6.00 x 2.72 x 0.32 in) | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~563 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 93.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9 | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 36W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 50 min | 55W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Light Blue, White, Aurora | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Models | - | V2056A, V2047 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
Meizu 18
- Compact and pocketable design
- Clean and streamlined software experience
- Snapdragon 888 performance
- Slower charging speed (36W)
- Limited camera details available
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
vivo X60 Pro+
- Faster 55W wired charging
- Superior camera system (expected)
- Longer battery endurance (91h rating)
- Larger and heavier form factor
- Potentially more software bloat
- May be more prone to throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 888 chipset, but their displays differ. The vivo X60 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 816 nits, suggesting a more visible screen outdoors compared to the Meizu 18 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely employ high refresh rate AMOLED panels, the X60 Pro+'s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage in direct sunlight. The Meizu 18’s smaller size likely results in a higher pixel density, potentially offering sharper visuals, but this is speculative without specific display resolution data.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X60 Pro+ is clearly positioned as the camera-focused device. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the 'Photo / Video' designation for the X60 Pro+ suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The X60 Pro+ likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Meizu 18, while capable, likely prioritizes a more balanced approach, potentially sacrificing some camera features for a smaller overall footprint. The absence of details on the Meizu 18’s camera system makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X60 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
Both the Meizu 18 and vivo X60 Pro+ are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). Therefore, raw CPU performance will be nearly identical. However, thermal management and sustained performance could vary. The vivo X60 Pro+, being a larger device, potentially has more surface area for heat dissipation, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM configurations are unknown for both, but faster LPDDR5 RAM would benefit multitasking and app loading speeds.
Battery Life
The vivo X60 Pro+ has a clear advantage in charging speed with its 55W wired charging capability, compared to the Meizu 18’s 36W. This translates to a significantly faster 0-100% charge time for the X60 Pro+ (estimated under 45 minutes) versus the Meizu 18 (50 minutes). The X60 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 91 hours, suggesting better overall battery life. While the Meizu 18’s smaller size may necessitate a smaller battery capacity, the X60 Pro+'s faster charging and higher endurance rating make it the more convenient option for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 18 if you need a truly compact flagship that’s easy to handle and offers a near-stock Android experience. It’s perfect for users who value portability and don’t want a bulky phone. Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you prefer a more feature-rich experience with a superior camera system and faster charging. This phone caters to users who frequently capture photos and videos and need a device that can keep up with their demanding lifestyle.