Meizu 18 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Two Android Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its 65W wired and 30W wireless charging capabilities, coupled with an endurance rating of 81 hours, significantly outperform the Meizu 18’s 36W charging and unspecified battery life. While the Meizu 18 offers a more pocketable design, the X3 Pro’s overall feature set provides a more complete flagship experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18 | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 03. Released 2021, March 08 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.4 x 69.2 x 8.2 mm (6.00 x 2.72 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~563 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 93.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 36W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 50 min | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Light Blue, White, Aurora | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | - | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 18
- Compact and pocketable design
- Snapdragon 888 performance
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower 36W charging
- No wireless charging
- Limited battery information
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- 65W wired and 30W wireless charging
- 81-hour endurance rating
- Brighter display (774 nits)
- Larger size and weight
- Potentially higher price
- Larger form factor may not suit all users
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, meaning graphical performance will be similar. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight. While both likely employ high refresh rate panels (a common feature for Snapdragon 888 phones), the Find X3 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), hinting at superior black levels. The Meizu 18’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult, but its smaller size may necessitate a lower resolution to maintain pixel density.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The absence of sensor size or megapixel counts makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given Oppo’s history, the Find X3 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensors for improved low-light performance. The Meizu 18, while capable, may prioritize a more streamlined camera experience. Without further details, assessing the camera capabilities remains speculative.
Performance
Both the Meizu 18 and Oppo Find X3 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. The key differentiator will likely be thermal management. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s larger chassis may provide more surface area for heat dissipation, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. RAM specifications are currently unknown for both devices, but LPDDR5 is expected, impacting application loading times and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro clearly excels in battery and charging. Its 65W wired charging can deliver a 40% charge in just 10 minutes, and a full charge in an unspecified time, while the Meizu 18 takes 50 minutes for a full charge at 36W. The Find X3 Pro also supports 30W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Meizu 18. Crucially, the Find X3 Pro has an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating superior battery life. While the Meizu 18’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed and lack of wireless options suggest it won’t match the X3 Pro’s longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 18 if you prioritize a genuinely compact flagship experience and value a smaller device that’s comfortable to use one-handed. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a potentially brighter display (774 nits measured), and a more comprehensive feature set, even if it means a larger phone.