Meizu 18 Pro vs. Tecno Camon 19 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship and Selfie-Focused Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and a premium build, the Meizu 18 Pro is the clear winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 888. However, the Tecno Camon 19 Pro offers a compelling package for selfie lovers and those seeking long battery life at a significantly lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 18 Pro | Tecno Camon 19 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 03. Released 2021, March 08 | 2022, June 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 73 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.87 x 0.32 in) | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Waterproof | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 420 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Flyme 9 | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 130˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.65”, 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 50 min 40W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, White, Gray | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian |
| Models | - | CI8, CI8n |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 348546 (v9) GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1) GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 18 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 888
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Likely higher quality display panel
- Potentially higher price
- May be harder to find depending on region
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Excellent battery endurance
- Focus on selfie camera quality
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu 18 Pro and Tecno Camon 19 Pro share a contrast ratio of 1597:1, suggesting similar dynamic range. However, the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s measured peak brightness of 479 nits is a key differentiator. While adequate for indoor use, it falls short of the brightness levels typically found in flagship devices, potentially impacting outdoor visibility. Details regarding the Meizu 18 Pro’s display brightness are missing, but given its flagship status, it likely surpasses the Tecno’s output. Panel technology details are absent for both, but the Meizu’s higher price point suggests a potentially superior panel with features like higher refresh rates or LTPO technology.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Meizu 18 Pro, as a flagship, likely features a larger, more sophisticated main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS). The Tecno Camon 19 Pro likely focuses on its front-facing camera, potentially offering advanced features like autofocus and image stabilization for selfies. The lack of detail regarding lens apertures further complicates the comparison, but a wider aperture on the Meizu 18 Pro would suggest better low-light performance. We can safely assume the Tecno Camon 19 Pro prioritizes selfie quality over overall camera versatility.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Meizu 18 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) boasts a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A78 cores and four Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Helio G96, with its two Cortex-A76 cores and six Cortex-A55 cores, is geared towards efficient performance rather than outright speed. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly favor the Meizu 18 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Meizu 18 Pro supports 40W wired charging, reaching 40% in 15 minutes and 100% in 50 minutes, alongside 40W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro is limited to 33W wired charging, taking 65 minutes to reach a full charge. While the endurance ratings are identical, the Meizu 18 Pro offers significantly faster charging options, providing greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 18 Pro if you need a powerful, compact phone for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value fast charging speeds (both wired and wireless). Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you prioritize selfie quality, extended battery endurance, and a more affordable price, accepting a trade-off in processing power.