Meizu 17 vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G is the better choice. While the Meizu 17 offers a compelling package, the S22’s more modern chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Exynos 2200 depending on region), brighter display, and continued software support outweigh the Meizu’s strengths. However, the Meizu 17 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a unique design and potentially lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 17 | Samsung Galaxy S22 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm (5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 167 g / 168 g (mmWave) (5.89 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.1 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Gray, Aurora White | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | - | SM-S901B, SM-S901B/DS, SM-S901U, SM-S901U1, SM-S901W, SM-S901N, SM-S9010, SM-S901E, SM-S901E/DS |
| Price | About 530 EUR | $ 172.63 / C$ 304.00 / £ 186.11 / € 198.01 |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.15 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 745496 (v8), 881428 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 69fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17
- Unique and understated design.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Less prone to thermal throttling under sustained load (compared to early S22 batches).
- Older chipset with lower peak performance.
- Limited software update support.
- Display likely less bright than the S22.
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
- More powerful and efficient chipset (Exynos 2200 or Snapdragon 8 Gen 1).
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- Ongoing software updates and security patches.
- Potential for thermal throttling (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1).
- Higher price point.
- More mainstream design.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 982 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Meizu 17. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Meizu 17’s display quality is likely excellent, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and a more dynamic image. The S22’s smaller size (6.1 inches vs. Meizu 17’s 6.6 inches) also contributes to a higher pixel density, potentially resulting in a sharper image, though this is dependent on the Meizu 17’s resolution which is not provided.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the S22 likely holds an advantage. While both are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the S22 benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes (details unspecified). The Meizu 17’s camera system is likely excellent for its time, but the S22’s newer technology will deliver superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the S22 is almost certain, contributing to sharper images and smoother video recording. The 2MP macro camera on the Meizu 17 is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 17 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+), while the Galaxy S22 comes with either the Exynos 2200 (4nm - Europe) or Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm - ROW). The 4nm process node of the S22’s chips offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 7nm+ Snapdragon 865. The S22’s CPU, featuring the Cortex-X2 core, provides a performance uplift over the Meizu 17’s Cortex-A77. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load, a potential issue the 865 is less prone to. The S22’s LPDDR5 RAM (speed unspecified) is likely faster than the Meizu 17’s, further enhancing multitasking and application loading times.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S22 has an endurance rating of 85 hours, indicating respectable battery life. The Meizu 17 charges at 30W with QC3 support, achieving 45% charge in 30 minutes. The S22 offers 25W wired charging with PD3.0, 15W wireless charging (Qi), and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. While the Meizu 17’s charging speed is competitive, the S22’s wireless charging capabilities and reverse wireless charging provide added convenience. The S22’s endurance rating suggests comparable real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity, likely due to the more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 if you prioritize a unique, understated design aesthetic and are comfortable with potentially limited software updates. It’s ideal for users who value a compact form factor and don’t require the absolute latest in processing power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G if you demand the latest features, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more robust camera system with ongoing software support and security patches. It’s the better choice for power users and photography enthusiasts.