Launched within months of each other in 2020, the Meizu 17 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G represented the peak of Android flagship ambition. Both devices leveraged the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, but diverged in their approaches to charging, display technology, and overall user experience. Now, with price drops making them attractive options, a detailed comparison is crucial for discerning buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G offers a slightly more compelling package. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 865 chipset, the Mi 10 Pro’s significantly faster 50W wired charging and comparable battery endurance give it an edge in daily usability. The Meizu 17 Pro remains a strong contender, particularly for those prioritizing a more refined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom
20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF
32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 129˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min
27W wireless | 50W wired, PD3.0
30W wireless
5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mint, Black, White | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | - | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 595246 (v8)
GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17 Pro
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Meizu's Flyme OS)
- Understated and elegant design
- Competitive Snapdragon 865 performance
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Limited information on display specifications
- Less emphasis on camera features in marketing
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 50W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (858 nits)
- 30W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially more bloated software (Xiaomi's MIUI)
- Larger and more attention-grabbing design
- Potential for more aggressive power consumption
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu 17 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro utilize AMOLED panels, but the Mi 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 858 nits, suggesting a more visible outdoor experience in direct sunlight. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED), the lack of specific refresh rate data for the Meizu 17 Pro means the Mi 10 Pro likely offers a smoother visual experience if it supports a higher refresh rate (a common feature in this era). The absence of LTPO technology in either device means they won't achieve the variable refresh rate efficiencies of newer panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Given the Mi 10 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details on optical image stabilization (OIS) is a significant omission; its presence would be a key differentiator. We can assume both phones offer a range of shooting modes, but the Mi 10 Pro’s marketing emphasized its photographic prowess, suggesting a potential advantage in image quality.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable between the two. However, thermal management could differ based on cooling solutions and software optimization. The 7nm+ process node is efficient, but sustained workloads could still lead to throttling. RAM configurations aren't specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both devices exhibit an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite unspecified mAh capacities. However, the charging capabilities are where they diverge significantly. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro supports 50W wired charging with PD3.0, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the Meizu 17 Pro’s 30W QC3 charging (45% in 30 minutes). The Mi 10 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, providing greater versatility. This charging speed difference is a major practical advantage for the Mi 10 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 Pro if you value a cleaner, less cluttered Android experience and appreciate a more understated design aesthetic. It’s ideal for users who prioritize software polish and don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you prioritize rapid charging – its 50W wired charging is a significant advantage – and enjoy a vibrant, high-brightness display. It’s a better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's 50W charging generate excessive heat during prolonged use?
While 50W charging is fast, the Mi 10 Pro incorporates thermal management features to mitigate heat buildup. However, extended gaming or video recording sessions *while* charging could still result in noticeable warmth. The phone's software is designed to regulate charging speed to prevent overheating.
❓ Is the lack of a specified refresh rate on the Meizu 17 Pro a significant drawback for gaming?
If the Meizu 17 Pro lacks a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz), it could result in a less fluid gaming experience compared to devices with higher refresh rates. The Snapdragon 865 is capable of driving higher refresh rates, but the panel itself needs to support it. Without confirmation, it's a potential disadvantage for competitive gamers.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Meizu's Flyme OS and Xiaomi's MIUI?
Flyme OS, historically, has been known for its minimalist design and focus on customization. MIUI, on the other hand, is often characterized by its feature-richness and pre-installed apps. Users who prefer a cleaner, less cluttered experience may lean towards the Meizu 17 Pro, while those who appreciate extensive customization options might prefer the Mi 10 Pro.
