Meizu 17 Pro vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 65W SuperDart charging, capable of a full charge in just 35 minutes, significantly outperforms the Meizu 17 Pro’s 30W charging. While both share the same Snapdragon 865 chipset, the Realme’s charging advantage and comparable battery endurance make it more practical for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 17 Pro | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 129˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min 27W wireless | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint, Black, White | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | - | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17 Pro
- 27W Wireless Charging offers convenient power-up options.
- Potentially more refined software experience (Meizu's Flyme OS).
- Premium build quality (based on Meizu's brand reputation).
- Slower 30W wired charging compared to the Realme.
- Limited display specifications (brightness, refresh rate unknown).
- Camera details are sparse, making a quality assessment difficult.
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- 65W SuperDart charging provides incredibly fast wired charging.
- Higher peak display brightness (635 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Excellent battery endurance (90h rating).
- Lacks wireless charging capability.
- Software experience may be less polished than Meizu's Flyme OS.
- Camera details are sparse, making a quality assessment difficult.
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 865, meaning display performance is largely dependent on panel quality and optimization. The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a more visible screen in direct sunlight. While the Meizu 17 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the Realme’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating deep blacks, but real-world performance will depend on panel calibration. The absence of refresh rate data for the Meizu 17 Pro leaves a gap in comparison; the X50 Pro offered a 90Hz panel, a significant smoothness upgrade.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to be a significant selling point, as these sensors typically lack the resolution and dynamic range for truly compelling macro photography. Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role in differentiating the camera experience, but this is subjective and requires detailed image analysis beyond the provided data.
Performance
Both the Meizu 17 Pro and Realme X50 Pro 5G are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. However, sustained performance hinges on thermal management, a detail not provided for either device. The 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 is known to generate heat under prolonged load, and the effectiveness of each manufacturer’s cooling solution will determine the extent of throttling. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed (e.g., 2750MHz vs 3200MHz) is unknown, potentially impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging, achieving 100% in 35 minutes, is a clear advantage over the Meizu 17 Pro’s 30W charging (45% in 30 minutes). While the Meizu 17 Pro offers 27W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Realme X50 Pro 5G, the significantly faster wired charging of the Realme is more practical for most users. Both devices share a 90h endurance rating, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the faster charging of the Realme mitigates any potential concerns about battery drain, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 Pro if you prioritize a more refined software experience and appreciate the inclusion of 27W wireless charging. This phone caters to users who value convenience and are willing to trade some charging speed for wireless capabilities. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand the fastest possible wired charging and long-lasting battery life. This is the phone for users who are constantly on the go and need to minimize downtime.