Meizu 17 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Oppo Find X2 Pro is the clear winner. Its 65W SuperVOOC charging dramatically reduces downtime, reaching 100% in just 38 minutes, compared to the Meizu 17 Pro’s 30W charging. However, the Meizu 17 Pro offers competitive wireless charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 17 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 129˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min 27W wireless | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint, Black, White | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | - | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17 Pro
- Competitive wireless charging (27W)
- Balanced charging options (wired and wireless)
- Potentially more affordable (depending on market)
- Slower wired charging (30W vs 65W)
- Display likely less bright than Oppo
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Industry-leading 65W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter display (871 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (88h)
- Potentially higher price point
- Limited camera details available
- May throttle more under sustained load (potential)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 871 nits measured, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both phones utilize high-quality panels, the Oppo’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor users. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Oppo, suggesting excellent black levels. The Meizu 17 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, but given the era, it likely features a comparable AMOLED panel, though potentially with lower peak brightness. The lack of refresh rate information for both devices is a notable omission, but 60Hz was standard for flagships at the time.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a detailed comparison is impossible. The absence of details suggests neither phone focused on groundbreaking camera innovation. It’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups, but the quality and features will depend on the specific implementation. The lack of mention of a telephoto lens on either device suggests a focus on wide and ultrawide photography.
Performance
Both the Meizu 17 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 performance cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. Performance will be largely identical in CPU-bound tasks. The key differentiator will likely be thermal management. While both utilize the same chipset, Oppo’s cooling solutions were generally more robust during this period, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. RAM specifications are not provided, but both likely feature LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W wired charging, utilizing PD, is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Meizu 17 Pro’s 30W wired charging with QC3, which takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 45%. The Oppo also offers a competitive advantage with its wireless charging capabilities. Both phones share an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). The faster charging of the Oppo effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 Pro if you value a more balanced approach to charging, with respectable wired and strong wireless capabilities, and potentially prefer Meizu’s Flyme OS. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if minimizing charging time is paramount, and you appreciate the industry-leading 65W SuperVOOC technology and a brighter display for outdoor visibility.