Meizu 17 Pro vs Huawei P40 Pro+: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a smoother software experience, the Meizu 17 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset, coupled with a more streamlined Android build, offers a more responsive and consistent experience. While the P40 Pro+ boasts a compelling camera system, the Kirin 990's thermal management and software limitations hold it back.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 17 Pro | Huawei P40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2020, March 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 129˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min 27W wireless | 40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint, Black, White | White Ceramic, Black Ceramic |
| Models | - | ELS-N39, ELS-AN10 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 1000 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17 Pro
- Superior sustained performance with Snapdragon 865
- Cleaner Android software experience
- Faster app loading and smoother multitasking
- Competitive wireless charging speed
- Camera specs are unknown, making a direct comparison difficult
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
Huawei P40 Pro+
- Versatile camera system with advanced features
- Faster wired charging (40W)
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- High peak display brightness
- Kirin 990 prone to thermal throttling
- Software limitations due to geopolitical factors
- Image processing can appear artificial
Display Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 760 nits, suggesting a vibrant viewing experience in direct sunlight. While the Meizu 17 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to assume a comparable brightness level given its flagship status. Both devices likely utilize OLED panels for excellent contrast, with the P40 Pro+ explicitly stating an 'infinite' contrast ratio. The absence of refresh rate information for the Meizu 17 Pro is a notable omission; the P40 Pro+ doesn’t specify either, suggesting both may have stuck with standard 60Hz panels at the time of release. Bezels are likely similar, with both aiming for a modern, immersive design.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ is heavily marketed around its camera capabilities, but specific sensor details beyond 'Photo / Video' are missing. The P40 Pro+’s strength lies in its image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor (though not specified). The Meizu 17 Pro’s camera specs are also absent, making a direct sensor-to-sensor comparison impossible. However, given Meizu’s history, it’s likely to prioritize natural color reproduction and detail. The P40 Pro+’s image processing tends towards more saturated colors and aggressive sharpening, which may appeal to some users but can appear artificial. Without detailed specs, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but the P40 Pro+’s reputation suggests it has the edge in versatility and feature set.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 17 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Huawei P40 Pro+ employs the Kirin 990 5G (7nm+), also an octa-core CPU, but with a different core configuration – two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.86 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, the architectural differences between the Cortex-A77 and A76 favor the Snapdragon 865 in sustained performance. The Snapdragon 865’s 7nm+ process node also suggests slightly better thermal efficiency. The P40 Pro+’s Kirin 990 is known to exhibit thermal throttling under prolonged heavy loads, a potential issue for gamers. The Meizu 17 Pro, with its Snapdragon, is likely to maintain higher sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the charging capabilities differ significantly. The Huawei P40 Pro+ supports 40W wired and wireless charging, alongside 27W reverse wireless charging. The Meizu 17 Pro offers 30W wired, 27W wireless, but lacks reverse wireless charging. While the P40 Pro+ has faster wired charging, the difference isn’t massive. The 27W wireless charging is identical on both. The P40 Pro+'s reverse wireless charging is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories but not essential for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 Pro if you need a phone that excels in gaming, benefits from a cleaner Android experience, and prioritizes fast charging speeds. It's ideal for users who value performance and responsiveness above all else. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you are a photography enthusiast who demands the best possible camera capabilities, and are willing to accept potential software limitations and thermal concerns in exchange for a versatile and feature-rich imaging system.