Meizu 17 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7 is the better choice. Its Tensor G2 chip, while not a raw performance leader, excels in computational photography and AI features. However, the Meizu 17 Pro offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking fast charging and a capable, if older, flagship experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 17 Pro | Google Pixel 7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GQML3 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GQML3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GVU6C | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 08. Released 2020, May 11 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm (6.30 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 155.6 x 73.2 x 8.7 mm (6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 96.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 10, Flyme 8.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Features | 5-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 129˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC3, 45% in 30 min 27W wireless | 20W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 20W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4355 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint, Black, White | Obsidian, Lemongrass, Snow |
| Models | - | GVU6C, GQML3, GO3Z5 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 199.00 / $ 179.26 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 28,499 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 813114 (v9) GeekBench: 3288 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 17 Pro
- Faster wired and wireless charging speeds
- Potentially lower price point (due to age)
- Snapdragon 865 offers strong raw performance
- Older chipset and software support
- Less advanced camera processing
- No reverse wireless charging
Google Pixel 7
- Superior camera processing and AI features
- Guaranteed software updates and support
- More power-efficient chipset (Tensor G2)
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher initial price
- Raw performance slightly behind in some benchmarks
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 974 nits, compared to the Meizu 17 Pro’s unspecified peak brightness. While the Meizu 17 Pro’s display quality is likely excellent, the Pixel 7’s higher brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. The Pixel 7’s display technology isn’t specified beyond brightness and contrast, but its superior peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed for their camera capabilities, but approach it differently. The Pixel 7 leverages Google’s renowned computational photography, powered by the Tensor G2’s image signal processor. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7’s strength lies in its software processing, delivering consistently excellent photos and videos. The Meizu 17 Pro likely relies more on hardware capabilities, but without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Pixel 7’s video capabilities are also likely superior due to the Tensor G2’s dedicated processing for video stabilization and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 17 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Google Pixel 7, however, is powered by Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores (2.85 GHz) offer a slight clock speed advantage, the 5nm process node provides superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 7nm+ Snapdragon 865. This translates to potentially less throttling under sustained load for the Pixel 7. The Pixel 7’s focus on AI and machine learning tasks is where the Tensor G2 truly shines, offering features like Magic Eraser and improved voice recognition that the Snapdragon 865 cannot match.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Meizu 17 Pro offers faster wired charging at 30W (QC3), reaching 45% in 30 minutes, while the Pixel 7 is limited to 20W (PD3.0), achieving 50% in the same timeframe. The Meizu 17 Pro also supports 27W wireless charging, a significant advantage over the Pixel 7’s 20W wireless charging. The Pixel 7 adds reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Meizu 17 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 17 Pro if you need exceptionally fast 30W wired and 27W wireless charging, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. It’s ideal for users who prioritize power delivery and are willing to accept an older chipset. Buy the Google Pixel 7 if you prefer a seamless software experience, industry-leading computational photography, and the benefits of Google’s AI features, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.