The Meizu 16Xs and Oppo Reno2 F represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches to achieving that goal. The Meizu 16Xs leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 675, while the Oppo Reno2 F opts for MediaTek's Helio P70. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly faster charging experience, the Meizu 16Xs emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 675, built on an 11nm process, provides a more efficient and capable platform than the Helio P70, despite the Reno2 F's slightly higher clocked Cortex-A73 cores.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, June | 2019, August 28. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (5.98 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 162.4 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.3", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 8 MP, AF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 350 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue | Sky White, Lake Green |
| Models | - | CPH1989 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Meizu 16Xs
- Faster charging (24W vs 20W)
- More efficient Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Stronger sustained performance
- Less brand recognition than Oppo
- Potentially less readily available
Oppo Reno2 F
- Wider brand recognition and support
- Potentially smoother experience with basic tasks
- Higher clocked CPU cores (on paper)
- Quad-camera marketing appeal
- Less powerful Helio P70 chipset
- Slower charging (20W)
- Potential for throttling under load
- Reliance on low-resolution auxiliary cameras
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the core difference lies in the chipsets powering the phones. Display quality will likely be similar, with both targeting a standard FHD+ resolution for the price point. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the design trends of 2019. The impact of the chipset is indirect – a more powerful processor can render UI elements and animations more smoothly, enhancing the perceived display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of cameras, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed and quality. The Snapdragon 675’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more capable than the Helio P70’s, leading to faster image capture and potentially better noise reduction. The Reno2 F’s marketing focused on its quad-camera setup, but the presence of low-resolution auxiliary sensors (often 2MP) suggests limited practical benefit. The Meizu 16Xs likely prioritizes a cleaner, more efficient camera experience, relying on the strengths of its ISP.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Meizu 16Xs’ Snapdragon 675 (11nm) features a Kryo 460-based octa-core CPU, split into 2x2.0 GHz Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Silver cores. This architecture prioritizes efficiency and sustained performance. The Oppo Reno2 F’s Helio P70 (12nm) uses a more traditional Cortex-A73/A53 configuration with 4x2.1 GHz A73 and 4x2.0 GHz A53 cores. While the P70’s A73 cores have a higher clock speed, the 12nm process and the architectural differences in core design mean the Snapdragon 675 generally delivers superior multi-core and GPU performance. The 11nm process of the SD675 also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming or demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones offer adequate battery life for typical usage. The Meizu 16Xs supports 24W wired charging, while the Oppo Reno2 F is limited to 20W. This 20% difference in charging wattage translates to a noticeably faster 0-100% charge time for the Meizu 16Xs. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 675’s superior power efficiency means the Meizu 16Xs is likely to achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery cell.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16Xs if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps and moderate gaming sessions with greater consistency, and if you value faster charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Reno2 F if you prioritize a potentially smoother experience with less intensive tasks and prefer a brand with wider market recognition, accepting a trade-off in raw processing power and charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70 in the Oppo Reno2 F struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG?
While the Helio P70 can run PUBG, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 675 in the Meizu 16Xs offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and less frame rate fluctuation due to its more powerful GPU and better thermal management.
❓ Is the 20W charging on the Oppo Reno2 F significantly slower than the 24W on the Meizu 16Xs in real-world use?
Yes, the 24W charging on the Meizu 16Xs will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a roughly 15-20% faster 0-100% charge compared to the Oppo Reno2 F, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 675 in the Meizu 16Xs get hot during prolonged use, like video recording or gaming?
The Snapdragon 675 is relatively efficient, and the 11nm process helps with thermal management. While it will get warm during extended use, it's less prone to significant throttling compared to the Helio P70, meaning performance will remain more consistent over time.
