Both the Meizu 16Xs and Note 9 leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, aiming for a sweet spot of performance and affordability. However, despite sharing the same chipset, key differences in charging speed and subtle design choices create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which Meizu device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Meizu 16Xs emerges as the superior choice. While both phones offer identical processing power thanks to the Snapdragon 675, the 24W charging capability of the 16Xs significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for those constantly on the go. The Note 9 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, June | 2019, March. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 152 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (5.98 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 153.1 x 74.4 x 8.7 mm (6.03 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 96.4 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue | Black, White, Starlight Blue |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Meizu 16Xs
- Faster 24W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially slightly better display quality (speculative).
- May have a more premium build quality.
- Likely more expensive than the Note 9.
- No significant performance advantage over the Note 9.
Meizu Note 9
- More affordable price point.
- Identical processing power to the 16Xs.
- Solid value for budget-conscious users.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Potentially less refined design and build quality.
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature similar LCD panels, given their market positioning. However, detailed specifications regarding screen resolution, brightness (nits), and color gamut coverage are unavailable. The 16Xs, being positioned slightly higher, *may* benefit from a marginally better panel, but without concrete data, this remains speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective form factors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor specifications, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend on the primary sensor's resolution and aperture. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality; these are often included for marketing purposes rather than substantial photographic benefit. Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role, and differences in software tuning could lead to varying color science and dynamic range.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Meizu 16Xs and Note 9 are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) with an octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver). This means similar performance in everyday tasks, multitasking, and even moderate gaming. The absence of information regarding RAM type (LPDDR4x is probable) and storage speed (UFS 2.1 likely) prevents a deeper analysis of potential performance bottlenecks. Thermal management will likely be similar, relying on passive cooling solutions given the chipset's efficiency.
Battery Life
While battery capacities are not specified, the key differentiator is charging speed. The Meizu 16Xs supports 24W wired charging, while the Note 9 is limited to 18W. This 33% increase in charging wattage translates to a noticeably faster 0-100% charge time for the 16Xs. Even a partial charge (e.g., 0-50%) will be significantly quicker, providing a tangible benefit for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, but the faster charging of the 16Xs mitigates the impact of potentially similar battery capacities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16Xs if you prioritize faster charging and are willing to spend slightly more for the convenience. This phone suits users who actively use their devices throughout the day and need quick top-ups. Buy the Meizu Note 9 if you are on a tighter budget and don't mind a slower charging experience. It's a solid choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and charge overnight.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in charging time between the 16Xs and Note 9?
Yes, the 24W charging on the 16Xs will noticeably reduce charging times compared to the 18W charging on the Note 9. Expect a faster 0-100% charge, and especially quicker partial charges, making it more convenient for users who need to top up their battery frequently.
❓ Since both phones have the Snapdragon 675, will I see any difference in gaming performance?
No, gaming performance will be virtually identical. Both phones utilize the same Snapdragon 675 chipset and CPU configuration. Any minor differences would likely be attributable to RAM management or thermal throttling, but these are unlikely to be substantial.
❓ Is the difference in price between the 16Xs and Note 9 worth the faster charging?
That depends on your usage habits. If you frequently find yourself needing to charge your phone throughout the day, the faster charging of the 16Xs is a worthwhile investment. However, if you typically charge your phone overnight, the Note 9's slower charging may not be a significant drawback.
