Meizu 16Xs vs. Google Pixel 5: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 5 is the superior choice. While the Meizu 16Xs offers a compelling price point, the Pixel 5’s Snapdragon 765G provides a noticeable performance uplift, 5G support, and Google’s industry-leading software and camera experience. The Pixel 5’s wireless charging and reverse wireless charging are also significant advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 16Xs | Google Pixel 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 258, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave - GD1YQ |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6 - GTT9Q | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, June | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (5.98 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 144.7 x 70.4 x 8 mm (5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 151 g (5.33 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 87.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2 Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 12W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue | Just Black, Sorta Sage |
| Models | - | GD1YQ, GTT9Q, G5NZ6 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 181.31 / $ 272.44 / £ 136.00 |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 194.84 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 253.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Meizu 16Xs
- Potentially lower price point
- Sleek design (subjective)
- 24W fast wired charging
- Older Snapdragon 675 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Limited software support
Google Pixel 5
- Snapdragon 765G with 5G
- Excellent camera with Google’s software
- Guaranteed software updates
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slightly slower wired charging (18W)
- Potentially higher price
- May be harder to find new
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 699 nits, compared to the Meizu 16Xs (brightness data unavailable). This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While the 16Xs’ panel characteristics are unknown, the Pixel 5’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and wide viewing angles. The Pixel 5’s display is also likely to benefit from Google’s color calibration, ensuring accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs for the Meizu 16Xs are limited, the Pixel 5 is renowned for its computational photography prowess. The Pixel 5 leverages Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent photos, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 5’s camera system focuses on software optimization rather than relying on high megapixel counts. The 16Xs likely features a more standard camera setup, potentially lacking the dynamic range and detail captured by the Pixel 5. The Pixel 5’s image processing excels in HDR and low-light scenarios, providing a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Pixel 5’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Meizu 16Xs’ Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 7nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, resulting in better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Pixel 5’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – offers a more balanced and powerful processing experience than the 16Xs’ 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver. The 765G also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the 16Xs. Both phones have 8GB of RAM, but the Pixel 5’s superior chipset will utilize it more effectively.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Pixel 5’s 18W wired charging with PD2.0 support, 12W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wired charging offer significantly more versatility than the Meizu 16Xs’ 24W wired charging. The Pixel 5’s wireless charging capabilities are particularly convenient, while reverse wireless charging can be used to top up accessories like earbuds. While the 16Xs charges faster with 24W, the Pixel 5’s charging ecosystem is more complete.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16Xs if you prioritize a sleek design and are on a very tight budget, and don't require 5G connectivity or the latest software updates. It's a good option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 5 if you value a smooth, responsive user experience, excellent camera quality, 5G capabilities, and guaranteed software support. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable and feature-rich smartphone without the flagship price tag.