Meizu 16T vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium: Which Snapdragon 855 Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 27W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Meizu 16T offers a clean software experience, the K20 Pro Premium’s superior power and charging capabilities outweigh this advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 16T | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 78.2 x 8.3 mm (6.28 x 3.08 x 0.33 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Blue, Green | Carbon black, Flame red, Glacier blue, Summer Honey, Pearl White |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 450 EUR |
Meizu 16T
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Meizu Flyme OS)
- Sleek and minimalist design
- Competitive price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Potentially limited software updates
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- More powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset
- Faster 27W charging with QC4
- Feature-rich MIUI software
- MIUI can be bloated with pre-installed apps
- Pop-up camera mechanism adds a potential point of failure
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature AMOLED panels, common for this price point. However, detailed display specs (resolution, peak brightness, color gamut) are missing. The Meizu 16T’s design emphasizes slim bezels, potentially offering a slightly more immersive viewing experience. The K20 Pro Premium, with its pop-up camera, achieves a similar effect, but the mechanism introduces a potential point of failure. Without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the K20 Pro Premium’s larger screen size (based on typical K20 Pro variants) could translate to a more comfortable viewing experience for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but both phones likely feature multi-camera setups. The K20 Pro Premium, being the 'Premium' variant, may have a larger main sensor or a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Snapdragon 855+’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) also contributes to better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Without knowing sensor sizes and lens apertures, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the K20 Pro Premium’s superior processing power gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the Meizu 16T utilizes the Snapdragon 855, while the K20 Pro Premium boasts the Snapdragon 855+. The ‘+’ variant features a slightly higher clock speed (2.96 GHz vs 2.84 GHz on the Kryo 485 prime core) and an improved GPU. This translates to a roughly 15% performance uplift in GPU-intensive tasks like gaming. While both phones share the same CPU core configuration (1x2.84/2.96 GHz, 3x2.42 GHz, 4x1.78/1.8 GHz), the 855+’s enhanced thermal management allows it to sustain peak performance for longer periods, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The K20 Pro Premium’s advantage is further amplified by potentially faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X, though not explicitly stated).
Battery Life
The Meizu 16T’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the K20 Pro Premium’s 27W charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support. This means the K20 Pro Premium can replenish its battery much faster, a crucial advantage for power users. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The K20 Pro Premium’s QC4 support also offers wider compatibility with various chargers, ensuring optimal charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16T if you prioritize a minimalist software experience and a potentially more refined user interface, and are willing to trade some raw performance and charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium if you demand the best possible performance from the Snapdragon 855 family, need faster charging to keep you going throughout the day, and appreciate a feature-rich MIUI experience.