The Meizu 16T and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT represent different approaches to delivering high performance. The 16T, powered by the Snapdragon 855, offers a more mature, albeit older, platform. The F4 GT, with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, aims for bleeding-edge power, but at the cost of potential thermal challenges. This comparison dissects these trade-offs to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the superior choice. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle under sustained load, its peak performance significantly exceeds the Snapdragon 855 in the Meizu 16T. The F4 GT’s 120W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the similar 81-hour endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 78.2 x 8.3 mm (6.28 x 3.08 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Orange, Blue, Green | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | - | 21121210G |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Meizu 16T
- Proven stability of Snapdragon 855
- Potentially better thermal management
- More refined software experience (Meizu's Flyme OS)
- Significantly slower charging (18W)
- Outdated chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Lower peak performance
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (17 minutes to 100%)
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Likely higher refresh rate display
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be power-hungry
- Software experience may be less polished than Meizu's Flyme OS
Display Comparison
Both devices boast an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent OLED panels. However, the context data lacks specifics like peak brightness or refresh rate. Given the Poco F4 GT’s positioning as a gaming phone, it likely features a higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz or 144Hz) compared to the Meizu 16T, which would provide a smoother visual experience. Without further data, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or HDR support, but the F4 GT’s newer panel technology likely offers improvements in these areas.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only states 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the F4 GT’s more recent release, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Meizu 16T, while potentially capable, is likely to fall behind in low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of a telephoto lens on the F4 GT is also a possibility, offering greater versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Meizu 16T’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The Gen 1 utilizes the Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores, offering substantial gains in both single-core and multi-core performance. While the 855 is still capable, the Gen 1’s newer CPU architecture and Adreno GPU deliver a far superior gaming experience. However, the 4nm process doesn’t guarantee perfect thermal management; the Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load, a potential issue the 855 avoids due to its lower power draw. The F4 GT likely benefits from faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Meizu 16T’s 18W charging versus the Poco F4 GT’s blazing-fast 120W charging. The F4 GT can reach 100% charge in just 17 minutes, a massive advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While the 16T’s slower charging isn’t a deal-breaker, the F4 GT’s speed is a significant convenience factor. The 4nm process of the Gen 1 *should* offer better power efficiency, but the higher performance demands can negate this benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16T if you prioritize a proven, stable experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who value a refined software experience and don’t demand the absolute highest frame rates in demanding games. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you want the fastest possible performance, even if it means managing potential thermal throttling, and if rapid 120W charging is a must-have feature. This phone is geared towards gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate significant heat under sustained load. While the Poco F4 GT likely incorporates cooling solutions, some thermal throttling is expected during prolonged gaming. This may result in slightly reduced frame rates over time, but the peak performance will still be significantly higher than the Meizu 16T.
❓ Does the Meizu 16T's Flyme OS offer a significantly different user experience compared to Xiaomi's MIUI on the Poco F4 GT?
Yes, Meizu's Flyme OS is known for its minimalist design and focus on customization. It generally offers a cleaner and more refined experience compared to Xiaomi's MIUI, which is often criticized for bloatware and aggressive battery management. However, MIUI has improved significantly in recent versions.
❓ Will the Poco F4 GT's 120W charging degrade the battery health faster than the Meizu 16T's 18W charging?
While faster charging *can* contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, modern charging algorithms mitigate this effect. The Poco F4 GT's charging system is designed to protect the battery, and the convenience of 120W charging likely outweighs the minimal potential impact on long-term battery health.
