Meizu 16T vs Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is the stronger choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 855 chipset, the Mi 9T Pro’s significantly faster 27W charging with Quick Charge 4 support provides a tangible advantage in daily usability, offsetting the identical battery endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 16T | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, August 21. Released 2019, August 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 78.2 x 8.3 mm (6.28 x 3.08 x 0.33 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Blue, Green | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue |
| Models | - | M1903F11G |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8) GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 16T
- Clean and minimalist software experience (likely)
- Potentially more compact design (speculation based on brand history)
- Solid Snapdragon 855 performance
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited camera information suggests a potentially less capable system
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Faster 27W charging with QC4
- Likely more feature-rich camera system
- Strong Snapdragon 855 performance
- MIUI software can be bloated for some users
- Potentially larger and heavier design
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu 16T and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels typical of AMOLED panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Mi 9T Pro’s position as a slightly more premium offering, it’s reasonable to assume it may have a marginally brighter display, but without concrete data, this remains speculative. Both likely offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, suitable for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specific camera details beyond the chipset. Given the market positioning, the Mi 9T Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and more advanced image processing algorithms. While both phones likely offer capable cameras for everyday photography, the Mi 9T Pro is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer greater detail in images. The absence of information on OIS or lens apertures makes a definitive comparison impossible.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, paired with an identical octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be virtually indistinguishable between the two. Performance in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing will be comparable. Thermal management, however, could differ based on chassis design and cooling solutions – a factor not detailed in the provided data. The shared chipset ensures a smooth and responsive user experience on both phones.
Battery Life
Both the Meizu 16T and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage scenarios. However, the critical difference lies in charging speed. The Mi 9T Pro supports 27W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4), significantly faster than the Meizu 16T’s 18W charging. This translates to substantially quicker top-up times, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to recharge their devices. A full charge on the Mi 9T Pro will be noticeably faster than on the Meizu 16T.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16T if you prioritize a clean, minimalist software experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a good option for users who don’t heavily rely on fast top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro if you value rapid charging, a more feature-rich MIUI software experience, and a slightly more versatile feature set. It’s ideal for power users and gamers who need to quickly replenish their battery.