The Meizu 16T and Samsung Galaxy A70s represent interesting points in the mid-range market. The 16T, leveraging the older but potent Snapdragon 855, aims for near-flagship performance at a competitive price. The A70s, with the Snapdragon 675, prioritizes a balance of efficiency and features, including faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the Meizu 16T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 offers a significant leap in processing power over the A70s' Snapdragon 675. However, the A70s counters with faster 25W charging, making it a better choice for those who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 78.2 x 8.3 mm (6.28 x 3.08 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Orange, Blue, Green | Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Black |
| Models | - | SM-A707F, SM-A707FN, SM-A707GM, SM-A707MN, SM-A7070, SM-A707W |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
Meizu 16T
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 855)
- Better gaming performance
- Potentially superior image processing
- Slower charging (18W)
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Older chipset may have limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A70s
- Faster charging (25W)
- Potentially longer battery life
- More efficient processor (Snapdragon 675)
- Noticeably slower processor
- Less capable gaming performance
- May struggle with demanding applications
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Meizu 16T's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel, common for the brand, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A70s, typical of Samsung's A-series, also likely utilizes a Super AMOLED display. The key difference will likely be in peak brightness and color calibration, with Samsung generally offering more accurate color profiles. Bezels are expected to be relatively similar, reflecting the design trends of their release periods.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the Snapdragon 855 in the Meizu 16T generally supports more advanced image signal processors (ISPs), potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The A70s' Snapdragon 675 ISP is adequate for everyday photography, but will likely struggle in challenging conditions. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensors would be a critical differentiator, but is unknown. It's reasonable to assume Samsung's image processing algorithms will prioritize vibrant, social media-ready photos, while Meizu might aim for a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 16T's Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a flagship-class processor, boasting an octa-core configuration with a prime Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Samsung Galaxy A70s' Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 675, while capable, is a mid-range chip with a focus on efficiency. The 855's smaller 7nm process node translates to better thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load. Gamers and power users will immediately notice the difference in app launch speeds and overall system responsiveness on the 16T. The 675's Kryo 460 cores, while efficient, simply cannot match the 855's processing prowess.
Battery Life
The Meizu 16T features 18W wired charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A70s boasts 25W wired charging. While the 16T's Snapdragon 855 is more power-hungry, the A70s' faster charging significantly reduces downtime. A larger battery capacity on the A70s (assumed, given its market positioning) would further offset the 855's power draw. Expect the A70s to achieve a full charge considerably faster than the 16T, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16T if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications without compromise, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A70s if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on battery longevity and faster charging speeds, even if it means sacrificing some processing power. The A70s is ideal for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Meizu 16T overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 855 is known to throttle under sustained load, but the Meizu 16T's cooling solution (details unknown) will play a crucial role. While it won't maintain peak performance indefinitely, it will likely offer a better gaming experience than the A70s before throttling becomes noticeable. The 7nm process helps mitigate heat compared to older flagship chips.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 675 in the Samsung Galaxy A70s sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 675 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's not designed for maximum settings or extended gaming sessions. Expect occasional frame drops and potentially longer loading times compared to the Meizu 16T.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the A70s compared to the 18W on the 16T in real-world usage?
The 25W charging on the A70s will likely shave off around 30-45 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the 16T. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups, allowing you to add several hours of usage in just 15-20 minutes.
