Meizu 16s vs OnePlus 7: A Deep Dive into 2019 Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a balance of performance and value, the OnePlus 7 emerges as the slightly better choice. While the Meizu 16s offers a refined design, the OnePlus 7’s comparable performance, coupled with its endurance rating of 102 hours, provides a more practical and long-lasting experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 16s | OnePlus 7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, April | 2019, May 14. Released 2019, June 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.9 x 73.4 x 7.6 mm (5.98 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 157.7 x 74.8 x 8.2 mm (6.21 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 97.2 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Optic AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 7.3 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, OxygenOS 12.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 20MP, f/2.6, (telephoto), PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Six-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue | Mirror Gray, Red, Mirror Blue |
| Models | - | GM1901, GM1900, GM1905, GM1903 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 68dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 367812 (v7) GeekBench: 11075 (v4.4) GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 16s
- Potentially more compact design
- Faster wired charging (24W)
- Premium build quality (assumed based on brand reputation)
- Unknown battery capacity and endurance
- Limited display brightness information
- Potentially less optimized software
OnePlus 7
- Excellent battery life (102h endurance)
- Brighter display (642 nits)
- Optimized software for performance
- Slightly slower wired charging (20W)
- Larger form factor
- Less emphasis on premium aesthetics
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu 16s and OnePlus 7 feature displays designed for immersive content consumption, but differ in key areas. The OnePlus 7 boasts a measured peak brightness of 642 nits, significantly brighter than what is known about the Meizu 16s, making it more usable in direct sunlight. While the OnePlus 7’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘infinite’ (typical for OLED), the lack of specific details on the Meizu 16s’ panel technology leaves the OnePlus 7 with a clear advantage for outdoor visibility. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices means we can't compare smoothness, but both would have been standard 60Hz panels for the time.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a definitive comparison is difficult. The absence of information suggests neither phone was a standout camera performer compared to competitors at the time. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones of this era is likely present on at least one of these devices, but its utility is minimal due to the small sensor size and limited dynamic range.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, and 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485). This means raw processing power is virtually identical. However, thermal management and sustained performance could differ. The OnePlus 7, known for its optimized software, likely benefits from more efficient thermal throttling, allowing it to maintain peak performance for longer durations during demanding tasks. The lack of RAM specifications for the Meizu 16s prevents a direct comparison, but the OnePlus 7’s RAM configuration would have been a key factor in multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 7 holds a significant advantage in battery endurance, boasting a 102-hour rating. While the Meizu 16s’ battery capacity is unknown, the OnePlus 7’s larger endurance rating suggests a more efficient power management system or a larger battery. The OnePlus 7’s 20W wired charging is slightly slower than the Meizu 16s’ 24W wired charging, but the difference in charging speed is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use, especially considering the OnePlus 7’s superior battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16s if you prioritize a compact form factor and a more premium aesthetic, and are willing to potentially compromise on battery life. Buy the OnePlus 7 if you value all-day battery life, a brighter display, and a more aggressive price point, even if it means a slightly larger device.