The Meizu 16s Pro and Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Meizu, released with a flagship-level Snapdragon 855+ chipset, aimed to deliver high performance at a competitive price. Conversely, the Galaxy J7 Pro prioritized battery life and a reliable user experience, leveraging Samsung’s established brand and software ecosystem. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and demanding tasks like gaming, the Meizu 16s Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro provides excellent battery endurance and a more refined software experience for everyday use, making it a strong contender for those seeking reliability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2017, June. Released 2017, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.9 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (5.98 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 152.5 x 74.8 x 8 mm (6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Mali-T830 MP1 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), One UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Six-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), AF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
20MP, f/2.6, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 20MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | - |
| Music play | - | Up to 91 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 24 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Forest, Dream Unicorn, Black Mirror, White story | Black, Blue, Gold, Rose Gold |
| Models | - | SM-J730G, SM-J730GM |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.71 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.7dB / Crosstalk -92.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.998 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 68dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 82dB
|
| Performance | - |
GeekBench: 3768 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 1.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 16s Pro
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and demanding apps
- Likely superior camera performance
- Faster charging at 24W
- Potentially shorter battery life due to the power-hungry chipset
- Software support may be limited compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro
- Excellent battery life (107h endurance rating)
- Reliable Samsung software experience
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor
- Camera performance likely inferior to the Meizu 16s Pro
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of Infinite (nominal) and 3.998 in sunlight, suggesting comparable outdoor visibility. However, the Meizu 16s Pro likely benefits from a higher peak brightness due to its flagship positioning, though specific nits are unavailable. The J7 Pro’s display, while adequate, is likely to appear less vibrant in direct sunlight compared to the Meizu. Details regarding panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD) and refresh rates are missing for both, but the Meizu, being a higher-end device, may have a superior panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but details are sparse. The Meizu 16s Pro, positioned as a premium device, likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing. While the J7 Pro likely offers a decent camera for everyday snapshots, the Meizu is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer greater detail. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the J7 Pro is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, serving more as a marketing feature than a practical improvement.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Meizu 16s Pro’s Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a flagship-tier chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU with a peak clock speed of 2.96 GHz. This is dramatically faster than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro’s Exynos 7870 Octa (14nm) with its 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The 7nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 855+ also offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 14nm Exynos 7870. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far better gaming experience on the Meizu. The Exynos 7870 is sufficient for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Meizu 16s Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its more powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset will consume more power. The Meizu compensates with 24W wired charging, potentially offering faster recharge times than the J7 Pro. However, the J7 Pro’s superior endurance means users may not need to charge as frequently, making it a better choice for those prioritizing longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16s Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset and ample RAM provide a significant performance advantage. Buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery life, a dependable camera for casual photography, and a user-friendly interface, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7870 chip in the Galaxy J7 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 7870 is a relatively efficient chip, but it can experience thermal throttling during extended gaming. While it won't likely shut down, you may notice frame rate drops and reduced performance after 30-45 minutes of intensive gameplay. The Meizu 16s Pro, despite its more powerful chip, benefits from a 7nm process and potentially better thermal management.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited detail and image quality. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in soft, noisy images. While it can capture a close-up perspective, don't expect professional-level macro photography. The Meizu 16s Pro, if equipped with a higher-resolution camera, will likely deliver superior close-up results.
❓ Can the Meizu 16s Pro handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (90fps)?
The Snapdragon 855+ in the Meizu 16s Pro is more than capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates, potentially up to 90fps depending on the game's settings and the phone's display refresh rate (which is unknown). The Adreno 640 GPU provides ample graphical power for a smooth and responsive gaming experience, unlike the J7 Pro which would struggle to maintain stable frame rates at high settings.
