Meizu 16s Pro vs OnePlus 6T: A Detailed Comparison of Two 2019 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, reliable experience, the OnePlus 6T remains a solid choice. However, the Meizu 16s Pro, powered by the Snapdragon 855+, offers a noticeable performance uplift, making it the better option for demanding users and mobile gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 16s Pro | OnePlus 6T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - Europe, North America |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2018, October 29. Released 2018, November 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.9 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (5.98 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 157.5 x 74.8 x 8.2 mm (6.20 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.41 inches, 100.9 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Optic AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme 8 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, OxygenOS 11.1.1.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.6", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 20 MP (16 MP effective), f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Features | Six-LED dual-tone flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 20MP, f/2.6, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 24W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Twilight Forest, Dream Unicorn, Black Mirror, White story | Thunder Purple, Mirror Black, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | A6010, A6013 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.138 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 293994 (v7) GeekBench: 8977 (v4.4) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 16s Pro
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 855+
- Faster charging at 24W
- Potentially more premium build quality (based on Meizu's brand image)
- Less established software support compared to OnePlus
- Limited availability in some markets
OnePlus 6T
- Excellent battery life (90h endurance)
- Well-regarded software experience (historically)
- Wider availability and established user base
- Older Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Slower charging speed at 20W
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu 16s Pro and OnePlus 6T feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) and a 4.138 sunlight contrast ratio, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks detailed specifications like panel type (AMOLED is assumed for both) and resolution. The absence of refresh rate information suggests both are likely 60Hz panels. The key difference lies in potential panel calibration and color accuracy, which would require direct testing. Bezels are also not specified, but Meizu historically focused on minimizing these.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the context data is insufficient for a detailed comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, the market positioning suggests the Meizu 16s Pro likely prioritized camera performance more heavily, potentially featuring a larger sensor or more advanced image stabilization. The absence of any mention of a telephoto lens on either device suggests both rely on digital zoom for long-range photography. The usefulness of any secondary cameras (like a macro lens) is questionable without further details.
Performance
The Meizu 16s Pro’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the OnePlus 6T’s Snapdragon 845 (10nm). The 855+ features a faster Kryo 485 CPU core clocked at 2.96 GHz compared to the 845’s 2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold core. This, combined with the more efficient 7nm process, translates to improved sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The 855+ also boasts an upgraded GPU, offering a substantial graphics performance advantage. While both phones likely shipped with ample RAM, the 855+ benefits from faster LPDDR4X memory support, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Meizu 16s Pro and OnePlus 6T achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, despite the 16s Pro having a 24W charging speed versus the 6T’s 20W. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. While the 24W charging on the Meizu 16s Pro *should* result in faster 0-100% charging times, the identical endurance ratings indicate the Snapdragon 855+'s increased power consumption is offset by software optimizations or a slightly larger battery capacity (not specified in the data). Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu 16s Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming or demanding applications and appreciate a more premium build quality. Buy the OnePlus 6T if you value a well-rounded experience, excellent software support (historically), and a slightly more mature ecosystem. The 6T is ideal for everyday tasks and media consumption.