Meizu 15 Lite vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. While the Meizu 15 Lite offers a budget price, the Pixel 7a’s superior camera, significantly faster performance thanks to the Tensor G2 chip, and longer software support make it a much more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu 15 Lite | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, April. Released 2018, May | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 143.6 x 72.4 x 7.5 mm (5.65 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 145 g (5.11 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.46 inches, 82.2 cm2 (~79.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 7.1.2 (Nougat), Flyme 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Six-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.9, 1.4 µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Red | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | 15 Lite | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | GeekBench: 4464 (v4.4) | - |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 1070 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | GeekBench: 4464 (v4.4) | AnTuTu: 765281 (v9) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1), 3631 (v6) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu 15 Lite
- Compact design
- Affordable price
- Decent display
- Outdated chipset
- Mediocre camera
- Slow charging
- Limited software support
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera
- Fast performance (Tensor G2)
- Bright and vibrant display
- Long software support
- Wireless charging
- Impressive battery life
- Relatively expensive
- 18W wired charging (could be faster)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display (1070 nits) compared to the Meizu 15 Lite, offering better visibility in sunlight. While both have similar resolutions, the Pixel 7a's superior color accuracy and overall image quality provide a more enjoyable viewing experience. The Meizu 15 Lite's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Pixel 7a.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera is renowned for its exceptional image processing and consistently delivers stunning photos and videos. Google's computational photography is a major advantage. The Meizu 15 Lite's camera is decent in good lighting conditions, but falls short in low light and lacks the advanced features of the Pixel 7a.
Performance
Here, the Pixel 7a absolutely dominates. The Google Tensor G2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 626. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Pixel 7a. The Meizu 15 Lite can handle basic tasks, but struggles with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 76-hour rating. While both phones share the same 18W wired charging, the Pixel 7a also supports PD3.0 and wireless charging, offering greater flexibility. The Meizu 15 Lite's battery life is acceptable, but not as impressive as the Pixel 7a's.
Buying Guide
The Meizu 15 Lite is best suited for users on a very tight budget who prioritize a compact design and don't need cutting-edge performance or camera capabilities. The Google Pixel 7a is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a fantastic camera, smooth performance, and guaranteed software updates.