The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Maxwest Orbit 4400 and T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G represent two distinct approaches to delivering 5G connectivity on a budget. The Orbit 4400 aims for affordability above all else, while the REVVL V+ 5G attempts to balance cost with a more modern chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Orbit 4400’s aging MT6572M, making everyday tasks and even light gaming significantly smoother. While the Orbit 4400 is cheaper, the performance trade-off is too significant for most.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, September. Released 2013, October | 2021, July 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, July 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 127 x 64 x 9.3 mm (5.0 x 2.52 x 0.37 in) | 173.7 x 77.5 x 7.1 mm (6.84 x 3.05 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 115 g (4.06 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~56.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 16 MP |
| Triple | - | 16 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | VGA | 16 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 3.0, A2DP | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Yes |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 240 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Nebula Black |
| Price | - | About 170 EUR |
Maxwest Orbit 4400
- Lowest possible price point
- Functional for basic communication
- May have longer standby time due to less demanding chipset (though active use will negate this)
- Extremely slow performance
- Outdated chipset architecture
- Poor multitasking capabilities
- Likely inferior camera quality
T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G
- Significantly faster performance
- 5G connectivity with better responsiveness
- Faster 18W charging
- More efficient chipset for longer battery life during use
- Slightly higher price
- May not be ideal for extremely prolonged gaming sessions (thermal throttling is possible)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The Orbit 4400, with its older chipset, likely has a lower-quality panel with narrower viewing angles. The REVVL V+ 5G, benefiting from a more recent design cycle, may offer slightly better color reproduction and brightness, though neither is expected to compete with higher-end OLED displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The REVVL V+ 5G likely benefits from the improved image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 700 chipset, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Orbit 4400’s older chipset will likely struggle with noise reduction and dynamic range. Any claims of advanced features on the Orbit 4400 should be viewed skeptically.
Performance
The performance disparity is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Maxwest Orbit 4400’s Mediatek MT6572M, built on a 28nm process, features a dual-core Cortex-A7 CPU. This architecture is several generations old and struggles with modern multitasking. In contrast, the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G’s Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700, fabricated on a more efficient 7nm process, boasts an octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A76 cores represent a significant architectural leap, delivering substantially improved single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user experience on the REVVL V+ 5G.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but given the target price point, both likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. However, the REVVL V+ 5G’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. The more efficient 7nm Dimensity 700 chipset also contributes to better battery life, as it consumes less power than the 28nm MT6572M. Expect the REVVL V+ 5G to offer faster charging times and potentially longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Maxwest Orbit 4400 if you need a functional smartphone for extremely basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and your budget is severely constrained. Buy the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G if you prefer a more responsive experience, want to enjoy 5G connectivity without significant lag, and appreciate the convenience of faster 18W charging. The REVVL V+ 5G is the better choice for anyone planning to use their phone for more than just the essentials.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Maxwest Orbit 4400 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
Yes, the Orbit 4400’s Mediatek MT6572M chipset is significantly underpowered for modern applications. Expect noticeable lag when opening and using apps like Facebook, WhatsApp, or even the Google Chrome browser. Multitasking will be particularly problematic.
❓ Is the 5G on the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G actually usable, or is it too slow due to the chipset?
The Dimensity 700 in the REVVL V+ 5G provides a usable 5G experience. While it won’t match the speeds of flagship chipsets, it’s capable of delivering significantly faster download and upload speeds than 4G LTE, and the chipset is powerful enough to handle the data processing required for 5G connectivity without excessive lag.
❓ Can I play games like PUBG Mobile on the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G?
PUBG Mobile is playable on the REVVL V+ 5G, but you’ll likely need to use low graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Dimensity 700 isn’t a gaming powerhouse, and prolonged gaming sessions may result in some thermal throttling.
