The LG X4+ and Nokia 7.2 represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The X4+ prioritizes affordability, while the Nokia 7.2 aims for a more balanced experience with a more powerful chipset and improved display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia 7.2 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset delivers significantly better performance than the X4+'s Snapdragon 425, making it more capable for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Nokia 7.2's superior processing power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, February | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 148.6 x 75.1 x 8.6 mm (5.85 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172.3 g (6.07 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~277 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.3 inches, 77.4 cm2 (~69.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lavender Violet, Moroccan Blue | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | LM-X415L, LM-X410L, LM-X415S | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG X4+
- Extremely affordable price point
- Long battery endurance (69h)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Weak processor performance
- Likely lower quality display
- Slow charging speed
Nokia 7.2
- Significantly faster processor
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Potentially better camera performance
- Higher price than the LG X4+
- Slow charging speed (10W)
- Battery endurance is similar to the X4+
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly more appealing display experience. With a measured peak brightness of 585 nits and a 1342:1 contrast ratio, it offers vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in outdoor conditions. The LG X4+’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely features a lower brightness and contrast ratio, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience. The Nokia 7.2’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and general usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. However, given the Nokia 7.2’s overall positioning, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with features like better image stabilization and potentially larger sensor sizes. The LG X4+’s camera is likely focused on basic functionality. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Nokia 7.2 is expected to deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660, built on a 14nm process, features an octa-core CPU (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) compared to the LG X4+'s Snapdragon 425, a quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 processor fabricated on a larger 28nm node. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Nokia 7.2. The 14nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both the LG X4+ and Nokia 7.2 share an endurance rating of 69 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Nokia 7.2’s more efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset may contribute to slightly better real-world battery performance despite the same endurance rating. Both devices support 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today’s standards, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG X4+ if you need an extremely affordable device for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use, and battery life is your absolute top priority. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, enjoy occasional gaming, and value a brighter, more vibrant display. The Nokia 7.2 is the better choice for anyone who doesn't want to compromise on performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 powerful enough for modern mobile games?
The Snapdragon 660 is capable of running many popular mobile games at medium settings. While it won't deliver the same performance as flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly smoother gaming experience compared to the Snapdragon 425 in the LG X4+, which would struggle with more demanding titles.
❓ How does the 28nm process of the Snapdragon 425 affect the LG X4+'s battery life and performance?
The 28nm process is less efficient than the 14nm process used in the Snapdragon 660. This means the Snapdragon 425 consumes more power for the same level of performance, potentially leading to shorter battery life under heavy load and increased heat generation. The larger node size also limits the potential for performance optimization.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in app loading times between these two phones?
Yes, you will. The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660, with its octa-core CPU and more advanced architecture, will load apps much faster than the LG X4+'s Snapdragon 425. This difference will be noticeable in everyday tasks like opening social media apps, browsing the web, and launching games.
