LG Wing 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Clash of Innovation and Reliability
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the more sensible choice. Its significantly superior battery life – boasting an endurance rating of 119 hours versus the Wing’s 87 – and brighter display outweigh the Wing’s novelty. The A54 offers a more consistent and practical daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG Wing 5G | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 66, 260, 261 Sub6, mmWave - USA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 14. Released 2020, October 15 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 169.5 x 74.5 x 10.9 mm (6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant Water-repellent coating MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Rotating P-OLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Always-on display Secondary display: G-OLED, 1080 x 1240 pixels, 3.9 inches | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/1.9, 117˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, QC4 13W wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Gray, Illusion Sky | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | LMF100N, LM-F100N, LM-F100V, LM-F100 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 850 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 87h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -30.9 LUFS (Below average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 315688 (v8) GeekBench: 7898 (v4.4), 1952 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Wing 5G
- Unique swiveling form factor offers a novel user experience.
- QC4 fast charging support.
- Potentially more natural color reproduction in photos (depending on LG's processing).
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to the A54.
- Lower display brightness makes it harder to view outdoors.
- Older chipset may struggle with demanding tasks.
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent battery life with an endurance rating of 119 hours.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- More efficient Exynos 1380 chipset.
- Conventional design lacks the Wing’s innovative flair.
- Samsung’s image processing can be overly saturated for some users.
- 25W charging isn't the fastest available.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54’s display is a clear winner, achieving a measured peak brightness of 980 nits compared to the LG Wing 5G’s 586 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating excellent black levels, but the A54’s superior brightness makes a tangible difference in real-world usage. While both likely employ OLED panels, the A54’s brightness advantage suggests a more efficient panel or more aggressive power delivery.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, the focus should be on image processing. Samsung’s image processing typically emphasizes vibrant colors and strong contrast, while LG historically aimed for more natural tones. Without detailed sensor specs, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the A54’s likely benefits from Samsung’s ongoing software optimizations. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54 utilizes the Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset, while the LG Wing 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The Exynos 1380’s 5nm process node provides a theoretical efficiency advantage over the 7nm Snapdragon 765G, potentially leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The A54’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a different architectural approach than the Wing’s Kryo 475 cores, potentially impacting app compatibility and optimization. While both are octa-core, the A54’s newer architecture is likely to provide a smoother experience with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 dominates in battery performance. Its endurance rating of 119 hours significantly surpasses the LG Wing 5G’s 87 hours. While the Wing’s QC4 wired charging and 13W wireless charging are adequate, the A54’s 25W wired charging offers faster replenishment. The A54’s active use score of 11:15h further underscores its superior battery life, making it the clear choice for users who prioritize longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Wing 5G if you crave a genuinely different smartphone experience and are willing to compromise on battery life for its innovative dual-screen functionality. This phone is for the user who wants to stand out. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display, and a polished, reliable software experience. This is the phone for the user who values practicality and longevity.