The LG W41 and vivo V15 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects the differences between the MediaTek Helio G35-powered LG W41 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675-equipped vivo V15 Pro, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more refined experience, the vivo V15 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 675 chipset offers a noticeable advantage in processing power and efficiency, despite both phones sharing an identical 92-hour endurance rating. The LG W41 remains a viable option for basic tasks, but struggles to match the V15 Pro's capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 22. Released 2021, March 03 | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.5 x 77.3 x 9.3 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 900 x 1600 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~280 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 118.3 cm2 (~91.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 99.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, 24% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Laser Blue | Topaz Blue, Coral Red, Ruby Red |
| Models | LMK610IM, LM-K610IM | 1818, vivo 1818 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG W41
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance (92h)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Inferior processor (Helio G35)
- Likely slower charging speeds
- May struggle with demanding apps
vivo V15 Pro
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 675)
- Faster charging (18W, 24% in 15min)
- Better overall performance and responsiveness
- Potentially higher price
- Battery endurance is the same as the W41
- May be harder to find new
Display Comparison
Both the LG W41 and vivo V15 Pro share an 'infinite' contrast ratio and a sunlight readability score of 3.806, suggesting similar display quality under direct sunlight. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type (IPS, AMOLED) or resolution. Given the V15 Pro's positioning, it's likely to have a higher-quality panel, potentially AMOLED, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The absence of refresh rate information suggests both devices operate at the standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without sensor size, aperture, or feature details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the V15 Pro’s higher overall processing power suggests it will handle image processing more efficiently, resulting in faster capture times and potentially better image quality. The LG W41’s Helio G35 may struggle with complex image processing algorithms, leading to slower performance and potentially more noise in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR, but the V15 Pro likely offers more advanced modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V15 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) utilizes Kryo 460 cores – 2x Gold for performance and 6x Silver for efficiency – offering a more sophisticated architecture than the LG W41’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The G35’s Cortex-A53 cores, while efficient, are older and less powerful than the Kryo 460s. This translates to a noticeable performance gap in demanding applications and multitasking. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 675 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the LG W41 and vivo V15 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 92 hours. This suggests similar battery optimization despite the differing chipsets. However, the V15 Pro supports 18W wired charging, achieving 24% charge in 15 minutes. The LG W41’s charging speed is not specified, implying it’s likely slower. While both offer comparable longevity, the V15 Pro’s faster charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG W41 if you need a functional smartphone for very basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You're accepting compromises in performance and responsiveness. Buy the vivo V15 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more capable experience for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and capturing photos without significant lag. It offers a better balance of features and performance for a slightly higher investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the LG W41 struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The MediaTek Helio G35 in the LG W41 is a basic gaming chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops during intense moments. The vivo V15 Pro’s Snapdragon 675 offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the 92-hour battery endurance rating realistic for typical usage?
The 92-hour endurance rating is based on a specific testing methodology. Real-world battery life will vary depending on usage patterns, screen brightness, and network conditions. However, it indicates that both phones offer good battery life for moderate users.
❓ Does the vivo V15 Pro support fast charging protocols beyond 18W?
While the V15 Pro supports 18W charging, it's likely compatible with Qualcomm's Quick Charge protocol, potentially allowing for faster charging with a compatible charger. The LG W41's charging compatibility is unknown.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 675 handle multitasking compared to the Helio G35?
The Snapdragon 675’s more powerful CPU and efficient architecture allow for smoother multitasking. You’ll be able to switch between apps more quickly and run more apps in the background without experiencing significant slowdowns compared to the LG W41.
