The LG W41 Pro and vivo V25 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The W41 Pro, while older, aims for accessible gaming with its Helio G35 chipset. The V25, a more recent release, leverages the more powerful Dimensity 900, promising a smoother overall experience and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V25 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset delivers significantly better performance than the LG W41 Pro’s Helio G35, and the 44W charging is a substantial convenience. While both phones offer similar battery endurance ratings, the V25’s faster processing makes it the more versatile device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 22. Released 2021, March 03 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 166.5 x 77.3 x 9.3 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 900 x 1600 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~280 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 118.3 cm2 (~91.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Laser Blue | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue |
| Models | LMK610IM, LM-K610IM | V2202 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 120h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG W41 Pro
- Very affordable price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable for light gaming
- Outdated chipset
- Lower performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Slower charging (assumed)
vivo V25
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset
- Fast 44W charging
- Brighter and likely higher quality display
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Higher price than the LG W41 Pro
- May be overkill for basic users
- No expandable storage (assumed)
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 781 nits, compared to the LG W41 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays are described as having an infinite contrast ratio (a common marketing term), the V25’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The lack of detailed display specifications for the W41 Pro, such as refresh rate or panel type, suggests a more basic viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. However, the Dimensity 900’s integrated image signal processor (ISP) in the V25 is far more advanced than the ISP found in the Helio G35. This translates to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume the V25 will deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The LG W41 Pro’s camera is likely focused on basic functionality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The vivo V25’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, features a combination of Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A55 cores, offering a significant leap in CPU performance over the LG W41 Pro’s Helio G35. The G35 utilizes older Cortex-A53 cores and a less efficient 12nm process. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Dimensity 900’s more modern architecture also provides better power efficiency, despite the V25’s higher overall performance.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 120 hours. However, this metric doesn’t tell the whole story. The vivo V25’s 44W wired charging capability allows it to reach 61% charge in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the W41 Pro’s likely slower charging speed (specifications unavailable). While both may last a similar amount of time on a single charge, the V25’s faster charging minimizes downtime and offers greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG W41 Pro if you prioritize a very low entry price and basic gaming is your primary concern. It’s a functional device for essential tasks. Buy the vivo V25 if you value a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, better camera performance, and the convenience of rapid charging. It’s a more well-rounded device for everyday use and content creation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the vivo V25 capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 900 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver the absolute highest frame rates at maximum settings, it can comfortably run Genshin Impact and other popular titles at medium to high settings with stable performance. The 6nm process also helps manage thermals during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the LG W41 Pro suffer from significant performance throttling during prolonged gaming?
Given the Helio G35’s less efficient 12nm process and less sophisticated thermal management, the LG W41 Pro is likely to experience noticeable performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. While it can handle less demanding games, pushing it with graphically intensive titles will likely result in frame drops and reduced performance over time.
❓ What type of charging protocol does the vivo V25 use, and is a compatible charger included in the box?
The vivo V25 supports 44W fast charging using vivo’s proprietary FlashCharge technology. A compatible charger is typically included in the box, but it’s always best to verify this with the retailer. Using a non-compatible charger will significantly reduce charging speeds.
