The LG W30 and Oppo A5s (AX5s) represent a common battleground in the budget smartphone space. Both devices aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank. However, a key differentiator lies under the hood: the Mediatek Helio P22 in the LG W30 versus the Helio P35 in the Oppo A5s. This comparison will dissect these chipsets and their implications for everyday use.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and smoother multitasking, the Oppo A5s emerges as the better choice. The Helio P35’s faster core clock speeds and improved architecture provide a noticeable performance edge over the LG W30’s Helio P22, making it more suitable for demanding apps and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June. Released 2019, July | 2019, March 18. Released 2019, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 155.9 x 75.4 x 8.2 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | S-IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), ColorOS 5.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 18mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/3.4", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4230 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Thunder Blue, Platinum Grey, Aurora Green | Red, Black, Gold, Green |
| Models | LMX440IM, LM-X440IM, LMX440ZM, LM-X440ZM | CPH1909, CPH1920, CPH1912 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.82 W/kg (head) 0.32 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 76697 (v7)
GeekBench: 3534 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 4.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
LG W30
- Potentially lower price point.
- Reliable Mediatek Helio P22 chipset for basic tasks.
- Likely a clean Android experience (depending on LG’s software skin).
- Slower CPU performance compared to the Oppo A5s.
- Less responsive multitasking.
- May struggle with demanding applications.
Oppo A5s (AX5s)
- Faster Mediatek Helio P35 chipset for improved performance.
- Smoother multitasking and app launch times.
- Better suited for light gaming.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- Software experience may vary depending on Oppo’s ColorOS.
- Battery life may be marginally shorter due to increased performance.
Display Comparison
Neither LG nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. Given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding resolution, brightness, or color gamut suggests a focus on cost reduction. Users should expect standard viewing experiences, potentially with limited outdoor visibility. The display is not a differentiating factor based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor size or aperture data, a direct camera comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, common in this price range. However, the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the low resolution. Image processing quality will likely be similar, relying heavily on Mediatek’s ISP capabilities. Users should not expect flagship-level image quality from either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5s’s Mediatek Helio P35 features an octa-core CPU configuration with a split design: four cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and four at 1.8 GHz, all Cortex-A53. This contrasts with the LG W30’s Helio P22, which utilizes eight Cortex-A53 cores running at a uniform 2.0 GHz. The P35’s higher clock speeds, combined with architectural refinements, translate to approximately 10-15% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. This advantage is noticeable in app launch times and multitasking. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the P35’s more efficient design may offer slightly better thermal management under sustained load. The GPU performance difference is less pronounced, but the P35 still holds an edge for light gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified. However, given the similar chipsets and target market, both devices likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown. The Helio P35’s slightly improved efficiency *could* translate to marginally longer battery life in the Oppo A5s, but the difference will likely be minimal in real-world usage. Without charging speed data, it’s impossible to determine which device offers faster charging times.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG W30 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Buy the Oppo A5s (AX5s) if you prefer a more responsive user experience, enjoy occasional gaming, or frequently switch between multiple applications. The A5s offers a tangible performance boost for a relatively small price premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A5s handle PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio P35 in the Oppo A5s can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings (Medium or Low) to maintain a stable frame rate. The LG W30’s Helio P22 will struggle to provide a consistently smooth experience, even at the lowest settings.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P22 and P35 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both chipsets can handle basic tasks, the Oppo A5s with the Helio P35 will feel snappier when opening apps, switching between them, and browsing the web. The LG W30 may exhibit slight lag or stuttering during these activities.
❓ Which phone is better for watching videos?
Without display specifications, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the slightly more powerful GPU in the Oppo A5s might offer smoother playback of higher-resolution videos, assuming both phones have similar display capabilities.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging?
The provided data does not specify fast charging support for either device. Given their price point, it's unlikely that either phone supports significantly fast charging technologies. Expect standard 5W or 10W charging.
