Both the LG W30 Pro and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the budget smartphone space, but cater to slightly different priorities. The LG W30 Pro focuses on quick charging, while the Nokia 7.2 emphasizes display quality and a marginally more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia 7.2 is the better choice. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the Snapdragon 660 provides a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 632, making it more capable for multitasking and demanding applications. The Nokia 7.2's superior display also enhances the user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June. Released 2019, October | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.7 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.21 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, PDAF
8 MP, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired, 50% in 35 min | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4050 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Midnight Purple | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | LMX600IM, LM-X600IM | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG W30 Pro
- Faster charging speed (50% in 35 minutes)
- Comparable battery endurance to Nokia 7.2
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 632 chipset
- Display likely less bright than Nokia 7.2
- Limited performance for demanding apps
Nokia 7.2
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower 10W charging
- Similar battery endurance to LG W30 Pro
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits compared to the LG W30 Pro’s unspecified brightness. Both share a 1342:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar dynamic range. This higher brightness on the Nokia 7.2 translates to better visibility outdoors, a crucial benefit for users who spend significant time outside. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Nokia 7.2’s superior brightness gives it a clear edge in usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nokia 7.2’s chipset has a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) which will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The LG W30 Pro’s camera is likely competent for everyday snapshots, but the Nokia 7.2 has the potential for superior image quality. The absence of details on both phones makes it hard to assess the quality of the cameras.
Performance
The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 chipset, with its 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores, offers a performance advantage over the LG W30 Pro’s Snapdragon 632 (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold). The 660’s higher clock speeds and slightly more efficient architecture result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 14nm chips, the architectural improvements in the Kryo 260 cores provide a tangible benefit. The LG W30 Pro will handle basic tasks adequately, but the Nokia 7.2 is better equipped for more demanding workloads.
Battery Life
Both the LG W30 Pro and Nokia 7.2 achieve an endurance rating of 69 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, their charging approaches differ significantly. The LG W30 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 50% in just 35 minutes, while the Nokia 7.2 is limited to 10W wired charging. This means the LG W30 Pro is ideal for users who need a quick power boost, while the Nokia 7.2 requires a longer charging time to achieve a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG W30 Pro if you prioritize fast charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. Its 35-minute 50% charge time is a significant advantage. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value a smoother user experience, slightly better performance for apps and light gaming, and a brighter, higher-contrast display for media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 handle PUBG Mobile at playable frame rates?
The Snapdragon 660 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver a flagship-level experience, it's significantly better equipped than the Snapdragon 632 in the LG W30 Pro for gaming.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between the LG W30 Pro and Nokia 7.2 in real-world use?
The LG W30 Pro’s fast charging is a game-changer for users who need a quick top-up. Reaching 50% in 35 minutes is considerably faster than the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging, which will take significantly longer to achieve the same level. If you frequently find yourself with a low battery, the LG W30 Pro is the better choice.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 support any form of fast charging, even if it's not advertised?
While the Nokia 7.2 officially supports only 10W charging, it *may* be compatible with Quick Charge 3.0 chargers. However, it won't charge at the full Quick Charge 3.0 speed, and compatibility isn't guaranteed. You'll still be limited to a slower charging rate compared to the LG W30 Pro.
