Samsung Galaxy A13 vs LG W11: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers

The LG W11 and Samsung Galaxy A13 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The W11, an older model, focuses on providing basic functionality at a low price point. The A13, while still affordable, aims to deliver a more modern experience with a more powerful chipset and improved display technology. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A13 is the superior choice. Its Exynos 850 chipset provides a significant performance boost over the LG W11’s Helio P22, resulting in smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the A13’s brighter display and more modern features justify the slight price premium.

PHONES
Phone Names LG W11 Samsung Galaxy A13
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2020, November 062022, March 04
StatusCancelledAvailable. Released 2022, March 23
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions166.2 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.33 in)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight-195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52
OSAndroid 10Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single-8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, (wide)8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging-15W wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMidnight BlueBlack, White, Peach, Blue
ModelsLM-K310IMSM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N
PriceAbout 110 EUR€ 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00
SAR-0.49 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-0.37 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -29.7 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9) GeekBench: 588 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

LG W11

  • Lowest possible price point
  • Functional for basic tasks
  • Decent battery endurance

  • Outdated processor
  • Dim and less vibrant display
  • Limited performance for demanding apps

Samsung Galaxy A13

  • Significantly faster processor
  • Brighter and more vibrant display
  • Faster charging
  • More modern features

  • Slightly higher price
  • 2MP macro camera is largely ineffective
  • Still a budget device with limitations

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A13 boasts a significantly more appealing display experience. While both screens share a 1324:1 contrast ratio, the A13’s measured peak brightness of 587 nits is considerably higher than what’s expected from the W11’s panel. This translates to better visibility outdoors and a more vibrant image. The W11’s display, while functional, will likely appear dimmer and less saturated in comparison. The A13’s larger screen size (not specified in data, but typical for the A series) also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the specifics are unknown. Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both cameras prioritize affordability over image quality. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms generally offer more refined results than LG’s, potentially giving the A13 an edge in image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the A13 is unlikely to be a significant benefit, as these sensors typically lack the detail and clarity needed for compelling macro photography.

Performance

The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A13’s Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is a clear upgrade over the LG W11’s 12nm Mediatek Helio P22. The Exynos 850 utilizes a more efficient architecture with Cortex-A55 cores across all eight cores, whereas the Helio P22 uses older Cortex-A53 cores. This results in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved overall responsiveness on the A13. While both CPUs are clocked at 2.0 GHz, the architectural improvements of the Exynos chip provide a tangible performance advantage.

Battery Life

Both the LG W11 and Samsung Galaxy A13 achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the A13’s 15W wired charging is faster than what the W11 likely offers (based on its market segment), allowing for quicker top-ups. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the more efficient Exynos 850 in the A13 may contribute to slightly longer real-world battery life, even with a similar capacity.

Buying Guide

Buy the LG W11 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and only require a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone needs. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A13 if you prioritize performance, a better viewing experience, and a more future-proof device. The A13 is ideal for users who enjoy social media, streaming videos, or playing casual games.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A13 get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850 is a relatively efficient chip. While it will warm up during prolonged gaming, it’s unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling, providing a consistently playable experience for most mobile games. The 8nm process node contributes to better heat dissipation compared to the LG W11’s Helio P22.
❓ Is the LG W11 a good choice for elderly users who primarily make calls and send texts?
Yes, the LG W11 is a suitable option for users with basic needs. Its simplicity and low price make it an accessible choice for those who primarily use a phone for communication. However, the smaller screen and slower performance may be frustrating for some.
❓ How much storage does the Samsung Galaxy A13 typically come with, and is it expandable?
While not specified in the provided data, the Samsung Galaxy A13 typically comes with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage and supports microSD card expansion, allowing you to add up to 1TB of additional storage for photos, videos, and other files.
❓ Will the LG W11 receive future software updates?
Given its age and market positioning, it's unlikely the LG W11 will receive significant software updates beyond security patches. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is more likely to receive at least one major Android version update, offering a longer software support lifespan.