LG Velvet vs Samsung Galaxy S22 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Two Android Approaches
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Exynos 2200) chipset, brighter display, and more refined camera system justify the price premium, despite the similar battery endurance ratings. However, the Velvet remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users prioritizing a unique design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG Velvet | Samsung Galaxy S22 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 28. Released 2020, July 31 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.1 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm (5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 167 g / 168 g (mmWave) (5.89 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.1 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.9, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC3 9W wireless | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Ion 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora Silver | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | LMG910EMW, LM-G910EMW | SM-S901B, SM-S901B/DS, SM-S901U, SM-S901U1, SM-S901W, SM-S901N, SM-S9010, SM-S901E, SM-S901E/DS |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 172.63 / C$ 304.00 / £ 186.11 / € 198.01 |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.15 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 745496 (v8), 881428 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 69fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Velvet
- Unique waterfall display design
- More affordable price point
- Headphone jack (likely, based on LG's historical inclusion)
- Outdated Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Less advanced camera system
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Exynos 2200)
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Faster charging and wireless charging capabilities
- Higher price point
- Potential for Exynos 2200 thermal throttling (Europe)
- More conventional design
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 982 nits, compared to the LG Velvet’s unspecified peak brightness. While the Velvet’s waterfall display is visually striking, the S22’s panel likely offers superior outdoor visibility and color accuracy. The S22’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a more effective implementation of OLED technology, delivering deeper blacks. The lack of refresh rate information for the Velvet means the S22 likely has a smoother experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the S22 likely holds an advantage in image processing and overall versatility. While both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, the S22 benefits from a more modern image signal processor (ISP) within its chipset. The Velvet’s camera details are sparse, but it’s unlikely to match the S22’s ability to capture detail in challenging lighting conditions or record high-resolution video. The S22’s sensor size and lens apertures are likely larger, contributing to better low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG Velvet’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10nm) is a capable performer, but it’s generations behind the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G’s Exynos 2200 (4nm - Europe) or Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm - ROW). The 4nm process node of the S22’s chipsets provides significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance during demanding tasks. The S22’s CPU architecture, featuring Cortex-X2 cores, offers a substantial performance uplift over the Velvet’s Kryo 385 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices share an Endurance rating of 85h, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the significant differences in chipset efficiency. However, the S22 offers faster charging at 25W with PD3.0, compared to the Velvet’s 15W QC3.0. This means the S22 can be topped up much quicker. The S22 also includes 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Velvet.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Velvet if you prioritize a unique, waterfall display design and a lower price point, and are willing to accept compromises in processing power and camera capabilities. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G if you demand flagship-level performance for gaming and demanding applications, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a more versatile camera system, even if it means spending more.