The LG Velvet 5G and V60 ThinQ 5G represent distinct approaches to the 5G smartphone experience. The V60, released as a flagship, prioritized raw power, while the Velvet aimed for a more balanced package with a focus on design and affordability. With the V60 now often available at discounted prices, the decision between these two becomes more complex, demanding a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG V60 ThinQ 5G offers a superior experience. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly better performance, and its larger battery provides a substantial 24-hour endurance advantage. However, the Velvet remains a compelling option for those prioritizing a sleeker design and a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1000/75 Mbps, 5G 2Gbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 07. Released 2020, May 15 | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, March 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 213 g (Global)/ 218 g (Verizon) (7.51 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop"
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED | P-OLED, HDR10+ |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, LG UX | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm
0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.9, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 32-bit/192kHz audio
24-bit/192kHz audio recording |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio (USA model only) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired, PD3.0, QC4
9W wireless | Wired, PD2.0, QC4
Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora White, Aurora Green, Aurora Gray, Illusion Sunset, Red, Pink | Classy Blue, Classy White |
| Models | LM-G900N, LM-G900EM, LM-G900, LM-G900TM | LM-V600, A001LG |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 79h |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-23.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 297372 (v8)
GeekBench: 1905 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
LG Velvet 5G
- More modern and unique design
- Slightly more affordable price point
- 25W fast wired charging
- Significantly weaker processor
- Shorter battery life
- Lower peak display brightness
LG V60 ThinQ 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Much longer battery life
- Likely better camera image quality
- Less distinctive design
- Potentially higher price (depending on current deals)
- Larger and heavier form factor
Display Comparison
The LG V60 and Velvet both offer large displays, but differ in brightness and likely panel technology. The Velvet achieves a measured peak brightness of 617 nits, which is respectable but may struggle in direct sunlight. While both are advertised with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, this is a nominal specification. The V60, being a flagship, likely benefits from a more advanced panel with potentially better color accuracy and viewing angles, though specific measurements are unavailable. The Velvet’s design language, with its 'Waterfall' display, prioritizes aesthetics, while the V60’s display is more traditionally framed.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the V60, as the flagship, likely incorporates a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors for improved low-light performance. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is assumed on both, but the V60’s implementation is likely more refined. The Velvet’s camera is adequate for everyday photography and videography, but the V60 offers a higher ceiling for enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The V60’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) significantly outperforms the Velvet’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz versus the Velvet’s Kryo 475 Prime at 2.4 GHz – and a more capable GPU. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the V60. The 765G in the Velvet is still capable, but will show its limitations with graphically intensive games or demanding applications. The V60’s chipset also benefits from the more advanced 7nm+ manufacturing process, potentially offering better thermal efficiency under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the V60. Its endurance rating of 103 hours dwarfs the Velvet’s 79 hours. This 24-hour difference translates to a full day of additional usage on a single charge. While the Velvet supports faster wired charging at 25W (with PD3.0 and QC4), the V60 also supports QC4 and wireless charging, and the larger battery capacity means it will take longer to fully replenish. The Velvet’s 9W wireless charging is significantly slower than what the V60 likely offers.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Velvet 5G if you prioritize a more modern aesthetic, a lighter device, and are comfortable with slightly less demanding tasks like social media, streaming, and casual gaming. Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G if you need maximum performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value extended battery life for all-day use without needing to recharge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the Velvet struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G in the Velvet will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. While it can run the game, expect compromises in visual fidelity and potential stuttering. The V60’s Snapdragon 865 offers a much smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the LG Velvet compared to the V60, considering the 25W support?
While the Velvet supports 25W charging, the V60’s larger battery capacity means it will take longer to fully charge, even with comparable wattage. The Velvet will likely reach 100% faster, but the V60’s larger battery provides significantly more overall usage time.
❓ Is the difference in battery life between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The 24-hour endurance difference is substantial. Users of the V60 can realistically expect to get through a full day of heavy use without needing to top up, while Velvet users may need to charge before the end of the day, especially with demanding applications.
