The LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW and the LG Velvet 5G represent different approaches to the 5G smartphone experience. The V60, released as a flagship, prioritizes raw power with its Snapdragon 865, while the Velvet aims for a more balanced package with a focus on design and a more efficient Snapdragon 765G. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and sustained gaming, the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 provides a significant performance advantage. However, the LG Velvet 5G offers a compelling alternative for those prioritizing a sleek design and efficient battery life at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 260, 261 mmWave | 1, 3, 28, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1000/75 Mbps, 5G 2Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, April 02 | 2020, May 07. Released 2020, May 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 167.2 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.58 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop"
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, HDR10+ | P-OLED |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, LG UX |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm
0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm | 16 MP, f/1.9, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
24-bit/192kHz audio recording | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (USA model only) | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0, QC4
Wireless | 25W wired, PD3.0, QC4
9W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Classy Blue, Classy White | Aurora White, Aurora Green, Aurora Gray, Illusion Sunset, Red, Pink |
| Models | LM-V600VML, LMV600VML | LM-G900N, LM-G900EM, LM-G900, LM-G900TM |
| Price | About 870 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 297372 (v8)
GeekBench: 1905 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 865 processor
- Potentially brighter display (specifications unavailable)
- Wider charging protocol support (PD2.0, QC4)
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially lower battery efficiency due to the more powerful processor
LG Velvet 5G
- Sleek and stylish design
- Efficient Snapdragon 765G processor for all-day battery life
- 25W fast wired charging and 9W wireless charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the V60
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The LG Velvet 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 617 nits, a respectable figure, but the V60’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting it may offer a brighter experience. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating deep blacks. Without refresh rate data for the V60, it’s difficult to assess smoothness, but the Velvet’s design language emphasizes aesthetics, potentially at the expense of peak display performance. The Velvet’s focus on design is evident, but the V60 may offer a more visually impactful experience if it has a higher peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the V60’s flagship positioning suggests a more advanced camera system overall. The absence of details on the Velvet’s camera suggests a focus on software processing rather than hardware prowess. The V60 likely benefits from the Snapdragon 865’s superior image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. The lack of detail on both cameras makes a definitive judgement impossible, but the V60’s chipset gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG V60’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a flagship processor built for demanding workloads, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A77 clocked at 2.84 GHz. In contrast, the Velvet 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 765G (7nm), an upper-midrange chip with a slightly less powerful octa-core setup, maxing out at 2.4 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance gap, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. The V60’s superior CPU architecture and higher clock speeds will result in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. While the 765G is capable, it won’t match the V60’s sustained performance under heavy load.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW and the LG Velvet 5G share an endurance rating of 79 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite the V60’s more power-hungry processor. The Velvet compensates with a more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software. Charging speeds differ: the V60 supports PD2.0 and QC4, while the Velvet offers 25W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4, alongside 9W wireless charging. The V60’s charging protocol support is broader, but the Velvet’s 25W wired charging is faster than the Velvet’s 9W wireless option. The similar endurance ratings indicate efficient power management on both devices, but the V60’s faster wired charging capabilities provide a quicker top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or running multiple applications simultaneously. Buy the LG Velvet 5G if you prefer a more stylish and comfortable design, prioritize battery efficiency for all-day use, and don't require the absolute fastest performance available.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the LG Velvet 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. It won't deliver the same level of sustained performance as the Snapdragon 865 in the V60, which can maintain higher frame rates with maxed-out settings.
❓ What kind of charging speeds can I expect with the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW?
The LG V60 supports both PD2.0 and QC4 wired charging, allowing for fast charging with compatible adapters. While a specific 0-100% time isn't provided, it should be significantly faster than the Velvet's 25W charging, especially with a high-wattage PD charger.
❓ Is the 9W wireless charging on the LG Velvet 5G worth using, or should I stick to wired charging?
9W wireless charging is relatively slow. While convenient, it will take considerably longer to charge your Velvet 5G compared to the 25W wired charging. Wired charging is recommended for quickly topping up the battery.
❓ Given the similar battery endurance ratings, does the LG Velvet 5G actually last longer than the V60 in real-world use?
While both have a 79-hour endurance rating, the Velvet's more efficient Snapdragon 765G processor likely translates to longer screen-on time for typical usage scenarios. The V60's powerful processor will consume more power when actively used.
