LG V40 ThinQ vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: A Battle of Endurance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long battery life and 5G connectivity, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is the clear winner. Its 130-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the V40 ThinQ’s 64 hours. While the V40 offers a superior display and potentially faster processing, the A14 5G delivers a more practical experience for daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG V40 ThinQ | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - V405QA7 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - V405QA7 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - V405QA7 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, October 03. Released 2018, October 16 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 75.7 x 7.6 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, HDR10 | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (standard), f/1.5, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3-axis OIS 12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, 16mm (ultrawide), f/1.9, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., HDR video, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (standard), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 5 MP, 21mm (wide), f/2.2, 1.4µm | - |
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/48kHz audio recording Tuned with Meridian Audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 50% in 36 min 10W wireless (Qi) | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Platinum Gray, Carmine Red, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | V405, LM-V405, LM-V409N | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 330 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -94.1dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 64h | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 161500:1 (nominal), 4.256 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 77dB | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 254304 (v7) GeekBench: 8568 (v4.4) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 307886 (v9) GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG V40 ThinQ
- Superior display quality with exceptional contrast.
- Potentially faster processing power (Snapdragon 845).
- Supports wireless charging (Qi).
- Significantly shorter battery life.
- Older device with limited software support.
- Potential for battery degradation due to age.
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Exceptional battery life (130-hour endurance).
- Modern 5G connectivity.
- More efficient chipset (Exynos 1330/Dimensity 700).
- Inferior display quality compared to the V40 ThinQ.
- Slower charging speed.
- Lower processing power than the V40 ThinQ.
Display Comparison
The LG V40 ThinQ boasts a dramatically superior display, with a contrast ratio of 161500:1 compared to the Galaxy A14 5G’s 1334:1. This translates to deeper blacks and more vibrant colors on the V40. While the A14 5G reaches 519 nits of peak brightness, the V40’s nominal contrast ratio suggests excellent visibility even in bright sunlight. The A14 5G’s display is adequate for everyday tasks, but the V40’s panel is in a different league for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but a detailed comparison is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information. The V40 ThinQ likely features a more sophisticated camera system befitting its flagship status, potentially with larger sensors and better image stabilization. However, the A14 5G benefits from modern image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A14 5G is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit over the main sensor.
Performance
The LG V40 ThinQ’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, built on a 10nm process, was a flagship processor in its time, featuring an octa-core CPU clocked up to 2.8 GHz. However, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G’s Exynos 1330 (SM-A146B variant) or Dimensity 700 (SM-A146P variant), both fabricated on more efficient 5nm and 7nm nodes respectively, offer improved power efficiency. While the Snapdragon 845 may still outperform the Exynos 1330 in raw CPU benchmarks, the A14 5G’s chipset benefits from architectural improvements and potentially better thermal management, especially considering the V40’s age and potential battery degradation.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G dominates in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 130 hours versus the V40 ThinQ’s 64 hours. This substantial difference is likely due to the A14 5G’s more efficient chipset and potentially larger battery capacity (though specific capacity isn't provided). While the V40 ThinQ supports faster 18W wired charging with Quick Charge and PD2.0, and even 10W wireless charging, the A14 5G’s 15W charging is sufficient given its longer overall runtime. The A14 5G’s superior endurance minimizes the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG V40 ThinQ if you need a phone with a significantly better display for media consumption, prioritizing contrast and color accuracy, and are comfortable with an older device that may have limited software support. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G if you prefer extended battery life, 5G connectivity, and a more modern software experience, even if it means sacrificing some processing power and display quality.