LG V40 ThinQ vs. LG G8 ThinQ: A Detailed Comparison for Power Users
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG G8 ThinQ emerges as the better choice. Its newer Snapdragon 855 chipset delivers a noticeable performance boost, and the improved 79-hour endurance rating provides significantly longer battery life. While the V40’s camera is capable, the G8’s overall package offers a more modern and efficient experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG V40 ThinQ | LG G8 ThinQ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - V405QA7 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - V405QA7 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat19 1600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - V405QA7 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - Verison | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, October 03. Released 2018, October 16 | 2019, February 24. Released 2019, April 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 75.7 x 7.6 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 151.9 x 71.8 x 8.4 mm (5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 167 g (5.89 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop" *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~564 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, HDR10 | P-OLED, HDR10 |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) - single-SIM modelmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual or Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF or 12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF 12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (standard), f/1.5, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3-axis OIS 12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, 16mm (ultrawide), f/1.9, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., HDR video, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR10, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (standard), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 5 MP, 21mm (wide), f/2.2, 1.4µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.22µm, AF TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/48kHz audio recording Tuned with Meridian Audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Face ID, Hand ID, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 50% in 36 min 10W wireless (Qi) | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Platinum Gray, Carmine Red, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue | Platinum Gray, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue, Carmine Red |
| Models | V405, LM-V405, LM-V409N | LMG820QM7, LM-G820UMB, LMG820UM0, LMG820UM1, LMG820UM2, LM-G820N, LM-G820, LM-G820QM |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -94.1dB | Noise -94.1dB / Crosstalk -87.6dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 64h | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 161500:1 (nominal), 4.256 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: infinite |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 77dB | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 92dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 254304 (v7) GeekBench: 8568 (v4.4) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 331537 (v7), 362730 (v8) GeekBench: 10735 (v4.4), 2700 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG V40 ThinQ
- Slightly warmer, more saturated display (preference-based)
- Versatile triple-camera system with multiple focal lengths
- Supports PD2.0 for faster charging with compatible adapters
- Older Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Lower battery endurance (64h)
- Less efficient power consumption
LG G8 ThinQ
- More efficient Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Superior battery life (79h)
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Slightly slower wireless charging (9W)
- AI-driven image processing may not appeal to all users
- Potentially less vibrant display for those preferring warmer tones
Display Comparison
The LG G8 ThinQ boasts a significant advantage in display technology. While the V40’s display achieves an impressive 161500:1 contrast ratio (nominal), the G8’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED panel. More importantly, the G8’s measured peak brightness of 655 nits surpasses what we’d expect from the V40, making it more usable in direct sunlight. The V40’s contrast ratio, while high, is a nominal figure and likely doesn’t translate to the same real-world impact as the G8’s OLED. Both phones offer excellent viewing angles, but the G8’s superior brightness and contrast give it the edge for outdoor visibility and overall image quality.
Camera Comparison
Both the V40 and G8 ThinQ offer versatile camera systems, but the differences lie in their processing and feature sets. Both are capable of photo and video, but detailed sensor information is missing. The V40’s strength lies in its triple-camera array, offering a wider range of focal lengths. However, the G8’s AI-powered scene optimization and image processing algorithms likely deliver more consistent results in challenging lighting conditions. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the G8’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 855 likely provides an advantage in dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The move from the Snapdragon 845 (10nm) in the V40 to the Snapdragon 855 (7nm) in the G8 represents a substantial architectural leap. The 855’s smaller fabrication process translates to improved thermal efficiency and higher sustained performance. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration, the G8’s Kryo 485 cores offer a slight clock speed advantage and architectural improvements. This results in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in graphically intensive games. The V40’s 845 is still capable, but the G8’s 855 provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The LG G8 ThinQ delivers a clear victory in battery endurance. Its 79-hour rating significantly outpaces the V40’s 64-hour rating. This difference is attributable to the more efficient Snapdragon 855 chipset and potentially optimized software power management. While the V40 supports 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 3.0 and PD2.0, the G8 steps it up to 21W, offering slightly faster charging speeds. The G8’s wireless charging is also slightly slower at 9W compared to the V40’s 10W, but the overall battery life advantage outweighs this minor difference. The G8’s efficiency means less time tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG V40 ThinQ if you prioritize a slightly warmer, more saturated display and are heavily invested in video recording, potentially benefiting from its dedicated camera features. Buy the LG G8 ThinQ if you value longer battery life, smoother performance for demanding applications, and a brighter, more color-accurate display for everyday use. The G8 is the better all-rounder.