LG has a history of innovative smartphones, but the Ultra Tab and G8 ThinQ represent different approaches. The Ultra Tab aims for efficiency, while the G8 ThinQ prioritized flagship performance. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to see which device comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The LG G8 ThinQ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset, brighter display, wireless charging, and overall flagship features significantly outperform the Ultra Tab's more budget-focused Snapdragon 680. While the Ultra Tab offers decent efficiency, the G8's power and features justify its higher tier.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat19 1600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - Verison |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 05 | 2019, February 24. Released 2019, April 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 05 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 247.6 x 157.3 x 7.1 mm (9.75 x 6.19 x 0.28 in) | 151.9 x 71.8 x 8.4 mm (5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | No | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 458 g (1.01 lb) | 167 g (5.89 oz) |
| | MIL-STD 810G
Stylus support | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop"
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~564 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.35 inches, 304.9 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, HDR10 |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) - single-SIM modelmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual or Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF
or
12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF
12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR10, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.22µm, AF
TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | - | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes |
| | - | 32-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Face ID, Hand ID, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 16W wired, QC3 | 21W wired, PD, QC3
9W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 7040 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Charcoal Gray | Platinum Gray, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue, Carmine Red |
| Models | 10A30Q | LMG820QM7, LM-G820UMB, LMG820UM0, LMG820UM1, LMG820UM2, LM-G820N, LM-G820, LM-G820QM |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -94.1dB / Crosstalk -87.6dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 79h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: infinite |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 92dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 331537 (v7), 362730 (v8)
GeekBench: 10735 (v4.4), 2700 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Ultra Tab
- Affordable
- Efficient chipset (Snapdragon 680)
- Decent battery life (79h endurance)
- Lower performance
- Likely inferior display
- Limited charging options
- Older chipset
LG G8 ThinQ
- Flagship performance (Snapdragon 855)
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Wireless charging
- More advanced camera features (assumed)
- Older model (potentially outdated software support)
- Battery life may degrade over time
- Higher price (when originally released)
Display Comparison
The LG G8 ThinQ boasts a significantly brighter display at 655 nits compared to the Ultra Tab (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower). The G8's infinite contrast ratio suggests superior image quality and deeper blacks. While the Ultra Tab likely has a larger screen size due to its 'Tab' designation, the G8's superior brightness and contrast make it the display winner.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the G8 ThinQ's Snapdragon 855 typically supported more advanced camera features and image processing. The G8 likely has a more sophisticated camera system with better low-light performance and more features. Specific camera specs are missing for both, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the G8 is expected to be superior.
Performance
The Snapdragon 855 in the G8 ThinQ is a powerhouse compared to the Snapdragon 680 in the Ultra Tab. The 855's 7nm process and higher clock speeds translate to noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Ultra Tab's 6nm Snapdragon 680 is efficient, but it can't compete with the G8's raw power.
Battery Life
Both devices claim an impressive endurance rating of 79 hours. However, the G8 ThinQ has a more efficient charging system with 21W wired and 9W wireless charging, while the Ultra Tab is limited to 16W wired QC3 charging. While battery life is similar on paper, the G8's charging options provide more flexibility.
Buying Guide
The LG Ultra Tab is best suited for users prioritizing affordability and basic functionality. It's a good option for light users who primarily browse the web, use social media, and make calls. The LG G8 ThinQ is ideal for power users, photographers, and anyone who wants a premium Android experience with flagship performance and features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the LG Ultra Tab worth buying in 2024?
It depends on your needs. If you're on a tight budget and only need basic functionality, it might be a viable option. However, consider the age of the device and potential lack of software updates.
❓ What are the key differences between the LG G8 ThinQ and other flagship phones from the same era?
The G8 ThinQ's key differentiator was its 'Crystal Sound' technology, which used the screen as a speaker. It also offered a clean Android experience and a competitive camera system for its time.
