LG Stylo 5 vs Motorola Moto G Pro: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 665 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Stylo 5’s Snapdragon 450, and its comparable battery life, despite slower charging, offers more sustained usability. The Moto G Pro delivers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG Stylo 5 | Motorola Moto G Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, June. Released 2019, June | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.7 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) | 158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Stylus | Stylus Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Android One |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP | - |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blonde Rose, Platinum Gray | Mystic indigo |
| Models | LM-Q720 | XT2043-7 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 320 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise-93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.0dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 79h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1485 (nominal), 3.218 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1422:1 |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 62dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 70dB | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | GeekBench: 4695 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 173611 (v8) GeekBench: 1385 (v5.1) GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Stylo 5
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance for light users
- Less powerful Snapdragon 450 chipset
- Lower peak display brightness
- May struggle with demanding apps
Motorola Moto G Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Excellent battery endurance
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May not be significantly faster in everyday tasks
Display Comparison
Both the LG Stylo 5 and Motorola Moto G Pro feature displays with a 1485:1 and 1422:1 contrast ratio respectively, suggesting similar black levels and overall image quality. However, the Moto G Pro boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 642 nits compared to the Stylo 5’s nominal brightness, meaning it will be more visible outdoors under direct sunlight. While both offer adequate viewing experiences, the Moto G Pro’s brighter display provides a clear advantage in challenging lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the context data lacks specifics to draw meaningful comparisons beyond that. Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both utilize budget-friendly sensors and image processing algorithms. Without details on sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), it’s difficult to determine a clear winner. Users should manage expectations and not anticipate flagship-level camera performance from either device.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Pro’s Snapdragon 665 chipset, built on an 11nm process, represents a substantial upgrade over the LG Stylo 5’s Snapdragon 450 (14nm). The 665 features a more sophisticated CPU configuration – octa-core with a mix of 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores – compared to the Stylo 5’s uniform 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Moto G Pro. The 11nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during prolonged use.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Pro and LG Stylo 5 both achieve impressive endurance ratings of 88 hours and 79 hours respectively. While the Moto G Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its longer endurance suggests optimized power management despite the more powerful chipset. The LG Stylo 5 compensates with 20W wired charging, offering faster top-ups, while the Moto G Pro is limited to 15W. This trade-off means the Stylo 5 can quickly regain battery life, but the Moto G Pro will last longer between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Stylo 5 if you prioritize the convenience of 20W fast charging and frequently need to top up your battery throughout the day. It’s a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G Pro if you value sustained performance for multitasking, streaming, or casual gaming, and prefer a phone that can reliably last through a full day (or more) on a single charge. It’s ideal for users who don’t mind slower charging in exchange for longer battery life and a more responsive experience.