The LG Q92 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus represent a sweet spot in the market – affordable access to 5G connectivity. Both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, but diverge in areas like charging speed and display characteristics. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the most compelling user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the winner. While both phones share the same core processor, the 20W charging and measured 543 nits brightness provide a tangible advantage in daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 24. Released 2020, August 26 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.5 x 77.3 x 8.5 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Dark Blue, Red | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | LM-Q920N | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 299926 (v8)
GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Q92 5G
- Potential for refined audio experience (LG's historical strength)
- 5G connectivity at an affordable price
- Snapdragon 765G provides solid performance
- Slower 15W charging
- Missing display brightness specification
- LG's software support is uncertain
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Faster 20W charging
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- Established Motorola software update track record
- Similar CPU clock speed to LG Q92 5G
- Camera details are lacking
- IPS LCD panel (likely) may not offer the same vibrancy as AMOLED
Display Comparison
Both the LG Q92 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus feature displays with a 1269:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth and color pop. However, the Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, exceeding what we'd expect from this price bracket and offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the LG Q92 5G’s brightness isn’t specified, the Moto G 5G Plus’s advantage here is significant for outdoor users. Neither manufacturer details panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED, etc.), suggesting both likely utilize IPS LCDs, which are common in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of information suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance as a key selling point. It’s reasonable to assume both utilize multi-camera setups, but the quality will likely be adequate for social media sharing rather than professional photography. The lack of detail makes it impossible to determine if either phone offers features like OIS or advanced night modes.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset. The CPU configuration is nearly identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime (LG) vs 1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime (Motorola), 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. The slight clock speed difference in the prime core is unlikely to translate to a noticeable performance gap in real-world usage. Both phones benefit from the integrated 5G modem, but thermal management will be key. Given the similar hardware, sustained performance will likely depend on chassis design and cooling solutions, data for which is unavailable. Both will handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming without issue.
Battery Life
Both the LG Q92 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features 20W wired charging, significantly faster than the LG Q92 5G’s 15W charging. This translates to a quicker turnaround time from 0-100%, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the Moto G 5G Plus provides a practical benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Q92 5G if you prioritize a brand known for audio quality and a potentially more refined software experience (though LG's software support is now a concern). Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value faster charging, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a longer-established track record of software updates within the Motorola ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. Neither phone's thermal management is detailed, so prolonged gaming sessions could lead to some throttling, but the 765G is generally sufficient for mid-range gaming.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the LG Q92 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, given they both use the same modem?
The 5G performance should be largely identical, as both phones utilize the integrated 5G modem within the Snapdragon 765G. Actual speeds will depend on network availability and carrier support, not the phone itself. Antenna design *could* play a minor role, but it's unlikely to be a significant differentiator.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs a major concern for potential buyers?
Yes, it is. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing suggests that neither phone prioritizes camera quality. If photography is important to you, you'll likely want to consider alternatives with more detailed camera specifications.
