LG Q9 vs LG G6: A Deep Dive into LG's 2017 Snapdragon 821 Flagships

The LG Q9 and G6 represent LG's flagship efforts from 2017, both powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821. While sharing a core chipset, they target slightly different user priorities. The G6, with its 72-hour endurance rating, aimed for all-day usability, while the Q9 appears to have been positioned as a more streamlined, potentially value-focused alternative. This comparison dissects the nuances between these two devices to determine which one delivers the best experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing longevity and a slightly more refined display experience, the LG G6 is the better choice. Its 72-hour endurance rating provides peace of mind, and while the CPU clock speed difference is minimal, the G6's overall package offers a more complete flagship experience.

PHONES
Phone Names LG Q9 LG G6
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 381, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2019, January. Released 2019, July2017, February 26. Released 2017, April 07
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions153.2 x 71.9 x 7.9 mm (6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 in)148.9 x 71.9 x 7.9 mm (5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight159 g (5.61 oz)163 g (5.75 oz)
 IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditionsIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~564 ppi density)1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~564 ppi density)
Size6.1 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)5.7 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~78.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, HDR10IPS LCD, HDR10, Dolby Vision
 Always-on displayAlways-on display
Platform
CPUQuad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo)Quad-core (2x2.35 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo)
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm)Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm)
GPUAdreno 530Adreno 530
OSAndroid 8.1 (Oreo)Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), LG UX 8 UI
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 UFS 2.0UFS 2.0
Main Camera
Dual-13 MP, f/1.8, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 3-axis OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), no AF
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), PDAF-
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec.
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide)5 MP, f/2.2, 18mm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
 32-bit/192kHz audio32-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio (market dependent)
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging18W wired, QC318W wired, QC3, 50% in 30 min Wireless (USA)
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsCarmine Red, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan BlueAstro Black, Ice Platinum, Terra Gold, Marine Blue, Mystic White, Raspberry Rose, Moroccan Blue, Lavender Violet
ModelsLM-Q925S, LM-Q925L, LM-Q925KH870, H870DS, H873, H870S, LGM-G600L, H872, H871, LS993, US997, vs988, VS988, LGM-G600K, LGM-G600S, AS993, LGUS997, H870AR, H872PR, H871S, H870I
PriceAbout 400 EURAbout 240 EUR
SAR-0.65 W/kg (head)     1.23 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.23 W/kg (head)     0.15 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -94.4dB
Battery life-Endurance rating 72h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 2053 (nominal), 3.556 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 66dB / Noise 68dB / Ring 74dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 158785 (v7) GeekBench: 4175 (v4.4) GFXBench: 8.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

LG Q9

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Snapdragon 821 performance
  • QC3 fast charging

  • Battery life likely shorter than G6
  • Missing detailed specifications

LG G6

  • 72-hour endurance rating
  • Wireless charging (USA)
  • 50% charge in 30 minutes

  • Slightly lower CPU clock speed
  • Potentially higher price

Display Comparison

Both the LG Q9 and G6 share identical display characteristics: a contrast ratio of 2053 (nominal) and 3.556 (sunlight). This suggests a similar viewing experience in both indoor and outdoor conditions. The lack of information regarding panel type (IPS, OLED) or resolution limits a deeper analysis, but the shared contrast ratios indicate a comparable level of visual quality. The G6's established reputation suggests a well-calibrated display, though without specific data for the Q9, a direct comparison of color accuracy is impossible.

Camera Comparison

Both the LG Q9 and G6 feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. The market positioning of the G6 suggests a more refined camera experience, potentially with better low-light performance and image stabilization. The lack of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a significant omission. It's safe to assume both phones offer competent camera systems for their time, but the G6 likely holds an edge due to LG’s broader camera expertise.

Performance

Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) chipset, but the LG G6 boasts a slightly higher CPU clock speed – 2x2.35 GHz Kryo cores versus the Q9’s 2x2.15 GHz. While this 0.2 GHz difference isn’t massive, it could translate to marginally faster performance in CPU-intensive tasks. Both utilize the same 2x1.6 GHz Kryo cores for efficiency. The shared chipset and 14nm process node suggest similar thermal characteristics, though the Q9’s slightly lower clock speed *could* result in marginally lower heat output under sustained load. The absence of RAM specifications prevents a full performance assessment, but both likely feature sufficient RAM for smooth multitasking.

Battery Life

The LG G6 stands out with an impressive endurance rating of 72 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Q9’s battery capacity is not specified, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the G6’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. Both devices support 18W wired charging with QC3, and the G6 notably offers wireless charging (USA only) and can reach 50% charge in 30 minutes. This charging speed advantage, coupled with the longer endurance, makes the G6 the clear winner in the battery department.

Buying Guide

Buy the LG Q9 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with potentially slightly shorter battery life. It's a solid performer for everyday tasks and media consumption. Buy the LG G6 if you value all-day battery life, a proven track record of endurance, and a display with excellent contrast, making it ideal for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 821 in the LG Q9 experience throttling under heavy gaming loads?
The Snapdragon 821 is known to throttle under sustained heavy loads, but the Q9’s slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to the G6 *might* mitigate this to a small degree. However, without thermal testing data, it’s difficult to definitively say. Both phones will likely experience some performance reduction during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the LG Q9 a significant drawback?
For users who frequently utilize wireless charging, the absence of this feature on the Q9 is a notable omission, especially considering the LG G6 supports it. However, if you primarily rely on wired charging, this won’t be a major concern. The Q9 does still offer QC3 fast charging for quick top-ups.
❓ How does the LG G6's 72-hour endurance rating translate to real-world usage?
The 72-hour endurance rating indicates the G6 can last approximately three days with moderate usage, including web browsing, social media, and calls. Heavy users, particularly those who stream video or play games extensively, will likely experience shorter battery life, but it still offers significantly better longevity than many contemporary smartphones.