The LG Q70 and V60 ThinQ 5G represent distinct approaches within LG’s smartphone lineup. The Q70 aimed for affordability with a focus on essential features, while the V60 5G was positioned as a flagship, boasting 5G connectivity and high-end performance. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG V60 ThinQ 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and while both phones share a 103-hour endurance rating, the V60’s faster charging and 5G capabilities justify the price premium. However, the Q70 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users prioritizing simplicity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 66 - Verizon | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 28. Released 2019, October | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, March 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.1 x 76.8 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 213 g (Global)/ 218 g (Verizon) (7.51 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop"
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2310 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 101.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, HDR10+ |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, LG UX 9 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm
0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) |
| Dual or Triple | 32 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens
or
32 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio
24-bit/192kHz audio recording |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA model only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC3 | Wired, PD2.0, QC4
Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black | Classy Blue, Classy White |
| Models | LM-Q730N, LMQ620WA, LM-Q620WA, LM-Q620VAB, LMQ620VAB, LM-Q730 | LM-V600, A001LG |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
LG Q70
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (103h endurance)
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Limited charging speed (15W QC3)
- Inferior camera performance
LG V60 ThinQ 5G
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 865)
- Faster charging (PD2.0, QC4)
- 5G connectivity for future-proof speeds
- Superior camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier build
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the V60, as a flagship, likely features a higher-resolution and brighter panel than the Q70. The V60’s positioning suggests a more advanced display technology, potentially with a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations. The Q70, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The difference in display quality will be noticeable in color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, we can infer that the V60’s camera system is more sophisticated. Flagship phones typically feature larger image sensors and wider apertures, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The V60 likely includes optical image stabilization (OIS), a feature often absent in mid-range devices like the Q70. While both phones may offer similar shooting modes, the V60’s superior hardware and image processing algorithms will deliver noticeably better image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG V60 ThinQ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a generational leap ahead of the Q70’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – Cortex-A77 cores versus the Kryo 460 – resulting in significantly faster processing speeds. The 7nm+ manufacturing process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a dramatically smoother experience for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing on the V60. The Q70’s SD675 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the V60’s support for faster charging standards – PD2.0 and QC4 – provides a significant advantage. The Q70 is limited to 15W QC3 charging, meaning it will take considerably longer to fully recharge. The V60’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Q70 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life over raw performance and don’t require 5G connectivity. Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G if you demand a smoother, faster experience for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. It’s the better choice for power users who want future-proof 5G connectivity and a more capable camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 675 in the LG Q70 struggle with modern mobile games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle with graphically demanding games at higher settings. You may experience frame drops and lag, especially in titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact. The Q70 is better suited for casual gaming.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the LG V60 ThinQ 5G worth the extra cost if 5G isn't widely available in my area?
While 5G availability is a factor, the Snapdragon 865 chipset itself offers significant performance benefits even on 4G LTE networks. The V60 is a future-proof investment, and the faster processor and other flagship features justify the cost even without immediate 5G access.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the LG V60 compared to the Q70?
The LG V60 supports PD2.0 and QC4, allowing for significantly faster charging speeds than the Q70’s 15W QC3. While exact charging times depend on the adapter used, the V60 can likely reach a full charge in under 90 minutes, while the Q70 could take over two hours.
