The LG Q60 and Q6 represent LG's attempts to deliver affordable smartphones with a focus on essential features. While both phones share a similar target audience, the Q60 introduces a newer chipset, the MediaTek Helio P22, aiming for improved performance. This comparison dives deep into the differences, analyzing whether the Q60's upgrade is worth considering over the established Q6, which boasts a strong endurance rating.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG Q6 remains a compelling choice due to its proven 69-hour endurance rating. While the Q60's Helio P22 offers a theoretical performance boost, the Q6's efficiency and established reliability make it the better all-rounder for everyday tasks and users prioritizing battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2017, July. Released 2017, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 77 x 8.7 mm (6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 142.5 x 69.3 x 8.1 mm (5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 149 g (5.26 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~442 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 77.0 cm2 (~78.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 505 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), LG UX 7 | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), LG UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio with RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | HTML, Adobe Flash |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 372 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | New Moroccan Blue, Aurora Black | Astro Black, Ice Platinum, Mystic White, Terra Gold |
| Models | LMX525EAW, LMX525BAW, LM-X525 | M700, M703, LGM-X600L, LGM-X600K, LGM-X600S, US700 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -85.0dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1771:1 (nominal), 2.987 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 76dB
|
| Performance | - |
GeekBench: 2244 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Q60
- More powerful processor for smoother multitasking
- More efficient chipset (Helio P22) potentially improving battery life in some scenarios
- Likely benefits from newer software optimizations
- Battery life likely shorter than the LG Q6
- No specific battery details provided
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
LG Q6
- Exceptional 69-hour endurance rating
- Proven reliability of the Snapdragon 435 chipset
- Excellent value for money
- Less powerful processor compared to the Q60
- Older chipset technology
- May struggle with demanding applications
Display Comparison
Both the LG Q60 and Q6 feature displays with a nominal contrast ratio of 1771:1 and a sunlight contrast ratio of 2.987. This suggests a similar viewing experience in both indoor and outdoor conditions. However, the context data lacks specifics on resolution, panel type (IPS, TFT), and peak brightness. Given the budget nature of both devices, it's reasonable to assume both utilize IPS LCD panels, but the Q60 *may* benefit from slight improvements in color accuracy due to its newer production date, though this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). Given their price point, it's likely both phones feature basic camera setups. Without further information, it's difficult to determine a clear winner. The Q60 *might* benefit from slightly improved image processing capabilities due to its newer chipset, but this is speculative. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the LG Q60 utilizes the MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm) with an octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the LG Q6 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (28nm) with an octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. The Helio P22's 12nm process node is significantly more efficient than the Snapdragon 435's 28nm node, theoretically leading to better thermal management and potentially longer battery life *despite* the higher clock speed. However, the Snapdragon 435 is a well-established chipset known for its stability. The Q60's CPU clock speed is 30% higher, suggesting faster app launches and smoother multitasking, but the real-world difference will be noticeable primarily in less demanding applications. Gaming performance will also be improved on the Q60, but neither phone is designed for graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The LG Q6 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 69 hours, a significant advantage. The Q60's battery capacity and charging specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the Helio P22's more efficient 12nm process *could* partially offset the Q6's larger battery, but it's unlikely to match the Q6's proven endurance. The Q6's 69-hour rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day of moderate use, while the Q60 may require more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Q60 if you prioritize slightly faster app loading times and occasional light gaming, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life. Buy the LG Q6 if you value long-lasting battery performance, consistent reliability, and a proven track record for everyday use. The Q6 is ideal for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and basic social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the LG Q60 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio P22 in the Q60 is more capable than the Snapdragon 435 in the Q6, neither phone is ideal for demanding games like PUBG Mobile. You'll likely need to play on low settings to achieve a playable frame rate on the Q60, and the Q6 will struggle even more. These phones are better suited for casual gaming.
❓ Is the difference in processor speed noticeable in everyday tasks?
The 30% increase in CPU clock speed on the Q60 will result in slightly faster app loading times and smoother multitasking, but the difference won't be dramatic for typical usage like browsing the web, checking email, or using social media. The Q6 remains perfectly adequate for these tasks.
❓ How much does the more efficient chipset of the Q60 impact real-world battery life?
The Helio P22's 12nm process *should* offer some improvement in power efficiency compared to the Q6's Snapdragon 435. However, the Q6's already excellent 69-hour endurance rating is a significant hurdle. It's unlikely the Q60 will match the Q6's battery life, but it may offer a slight improvement over other phones with similar chipsets.
