LG Q52 vs. Motorola Moto G Power (2021): Which Budget Phone Delivers More?

The LG Q52 and Motorola Moto G Power (2021) represent compelling options in the sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on real-world performance implications for everyday users.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the LG Q52’s 12nm Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and better long-term responsiveness.

PHONES
Phone Names LG Q52 Motorola Moto G Power (2021)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2020, September 26. Released 2020, October 262021, January 08
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, January 14
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)165.3 x 75.9 x 9.5 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)206.5 g (7.30 oz)
 MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditionsWater-repellent coating
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610
OSAndroid 10Android 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Triple-48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging-15W wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSilky White, Silky RedFlash Gray, Polar Silver
ModelsLM-Q520N-
PriceAbout 240 EURAbout 60 EUR

LG Q52

  • Potentially lower initial cost.
  • May offer a slightly larger battery capacity (unconfirmed).
  • Simple and straightforward user interface.

  • Less powerful and efficient Helio P35 chipset.
  • Likely slower charging speeds.
  • Inferior graphics performance for gaming.

Motorola Moto G Power (2021)

  • More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset.
  • 15W wired charging support.
  • Superior graphics performance for casual gaming.
  • Better image processing capabilities.

  • May be slightly more expensive upfront.
  • Potentially less battery capacity than LG Q52 (unconfirmed).
  • Motorola’s software can include bloatware.

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The lack of specified refresh rates suggests both operate at the standard 60Hz. The key difference lies under the hood; the chipset’s graphics processing capabilities will influence the smoothness of scrolling and animations, favoring the Moto G Power. While neither manufacturer details peak brightness, the Snapdragon 662’s ISP often allows for better dynamic range and color calibration, potentially resulting in a more visually pleasing experience on the Motorola.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP) generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the Helio P35’s. This means better noise reduction, dynamic range, and color accuracy on the Motorola. While both phones likely include a standard macro lens, the quality of such sensors is typically low in this price range. The Motorola’s ISP is more likely to produce usable images in challenging lighting conditions, and its video recording capabilities will likely be superior.

Performance

The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, fabricated on an 11nm process. This is a significant advantage over the LG Q52’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 662’s Kryo 260 cores, while also utilizing an octa-core configuration, benefit from Qualcomm’s architectural optimizations and the more efficient manufacturing process. This translates to better sustained performance under load and improved power efficiency. The Helio P35, while capable for basic tasks, will likely exhibit more noticeable slowdowns during multitasking or when running demanding applications. The Snapdragon 662’s Adreno 610 GPU also provides a substantial graphics boost, making it the better choice for casual gaming.

Battery Life

The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) includes 15W wired charging, a feature absent from the LG Q52’s specifications. While neither phone boasts exceptionally fast charging, 15W provides a tangible benefit over slower charging methods. The Snapdragon 662’s superior power efficiency also contributes to longer battery life. While the LG Q52 may have a comparable or even slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the Helio P35’s less efficient architecture will likely result in shorter real-world usage times. The Moto G Power’s optimized power management will allow users to stretch a single charge further.

Buying Guide

Buy the LG Q52 if you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost and are primarily focused on basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) if you value a more responsive user experience, better battery optimization, and the ability to handle moderately demanding apps and occasional gaming without significant slowdowns.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a dedicated gaming phone, the Snapdragon 662 and Adreno 610 GPU in the Moto G Power (2021) can handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some occasional frame drops during intense action, but it’s a playable experience. The LG Q52’s Helio P35 will likely struggle to maintain consistent performance even at lower settings.
❓ How much faster is the Snapdragon 662 compared to the Helio P35 in real-world use?
The Snapdragon 662 offers a noticeable improvement in responsiveness and multitasking. App launch times will be quicker, scrolling will be smoother, and the phone will handle multiple apps open simultaneously with less slowdown. Benchmarks show the Snapdragon 662 consistently outperforms the Helio P35 by 30-50% in CPU and GPU tests, translating to a more fluid user experience.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) have a lot of bloatware?
Motorola has historically included some pre-installed apps (bloatware) on their devices. However, the amount has decreased in recent years. Many of these apps can be uninstalled, freeing up storage space and reducing clutter. It's a common trade-off for the lower price point.