LG Q52 vs. LG K62: A Deep Dive into Identical Hardware

The LG Q52 and LG K62 present a curious case in the budget smartphone market. Both devices are powered by the same MediaTek Helio P35 chipset, leading to a head-to-head comparison focused on subtle differences in design, features, and ultimately, value. This analysis will dissect these nuances to determine which phone best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user, the LG K62 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones offer identical processing power thanks to the Helio P35, the K62 often benefits from more aggressive pricing, making it the more compelling option for budget-conscious buyers. The Q52 isn't a bad phone, but the value proposition leans towards the K62.

PHONES
Phone Names LG Q52 LG K62
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - North America
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40 - Brazil
Launch
Announced2020, September 26. Released 2020, October 262020, September 23. Released 2020, November 27
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)186 g (6.56 oz)
 MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditionsMIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 10Android 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal64GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDRDual-LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm28 MP
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSilky White, Silky RedWhite, Sky Blue, Red
ModelsLM-Q520NLMK525H, LMK525, LM-K525H, LM-K525
PriceAbout 240 EURAbout 290 EUR

LG Q52

  • Identical Helio P35 performance to K62
  • Potentially better carrier availability
  • Reliable LG build quality

  • Often priced higher than the K62
  • No significant advantages over the K62
  • Limited gaming capabilities

LG K62

  • Identical Helio P35 performance to Q52
  • Generally more affordable
  • Good value for money

  • May require direct online purchase
  • Limited gaming capabilities
  • Potentially less robust carrier support

Display Comparison

Both the LG Q52 and K62 utilize displays that, while adequate for their price point, don't push any boundaries. Given the identical chipset, the display experience is likely very similar. We can infer, based on LG's typical budget phone strategy, that both likely employ IPS LCD panels. Without specific nit brightness data, it's reasonable to assume both offer sufficient visibility indoors, but may struggle in direct sunlight. Color accuracy is likely standard for this segment, prioritizing vibrancy over absolute fidelity. The absence of high refresh rate technology (90Hz or 120Hz) is expected, focusing on power efficiency.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is where subtle differences *might* emerge, but likely won't be dramatic. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but without specific sensor details, it's difficult to make definitive claims. It's probable that both include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro sensor. The image processing algorithms employed by LG will play a larger role than the hardware itself. Given the Helio P35's limitations, expect image processing to focus on basic enhancements rather than advanced computational photography features. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device should be viewed with skepticism; its utility is limited by the low resolution and lack of autofocus.

Performance

The core of both devices is the MediaTek Helio P35 (MT6765), a 12nm chipset featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with four cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This means performance will be virtually identical in CPU-bound tasks like web browsing, social media, and light multitasking. The GPU performance will also be the same. The real-world impact is that neither phone is suited for graphically intensive gaming or demanding applications. The shared chipset also implies similar thermal management characteristics; sustained heavy loads will likely result in throttling to prevent overheating. RAM configurations, if identical (which is likely given the shared platform), won't significantly alter this performance profile.

Battery Life

Battery life will be heavily influenced by usage patterns, but the shared chipset suggests similar power consumption. Without knowing the exact battery capacities of each device, it's difficult to predict a clear winner. However, charging wattage is a critical factor. If the K62 supports faster charging than the Q52, it will offer a more convenient user experience, even with a slightly smaller battery. A 0-100% charge time difference of 30-60 minutes could be significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups.

Buying Guide

Buy the LG Q52 if you prioritize a potentially more readily available device through specific carrier channels or find a significantly discounted price. Buy the LG K62 if you're seeking the absolute best value for your money and are comfortable with potentially sourcing it directly from online retailers. Both are suitable for basic tasks, but neither excels in demanding applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will either the LG Q52 or K62 run demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Unfortunately, no. The MediaTek Helio P35 chipset is not powerful enough to deliver a consistently smooth gaming experience in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile, even at low settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and lag, making it unsuitable for serious mobile gaming.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras often lack the detail and clarity needed to produce truly impressive macro shots. The fixed focus and low resolution limit their usefulness, and you'll likely get better results using the main camera and cropping.
❓ How does the Helio P35 handle multitasking between several apps?
The Helio P35 can handle basic multitasking – switching between a few apps like messaging, web browsing, and music playback – without significant issues. However, attempting to run many apps simultaneously or switching between resource-intensive applications will likely result in slowdowns and app reloading.