LG V35 ThinQ vs. LG Q Stylus: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG V35 ThinQ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset provides significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking, justifying the price difference. However, if stylus input and extreme affordability are paramount, the Q Stylus offers a functional experience at a lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG Q Stylus | LG V35 ThinQ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, June. Released 2018, August | 2018, May. Released 2018, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 77.7 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 151.7 x 75.4 x 7.3 mm (5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| Stylus IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~538 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 99.7 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, HDR10 |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) - Q Stylus/Q Stylus αOcta-core 1.8 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 - Q Stylus/Q Stylus α | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T860MP2 - Q Stylus/Q Stylus α | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.6, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3-axis OIS 16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF (Q Stylus α) 16 MP, PDAF (Q Stylus/ Q Stylus+) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., HDR10 video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP or 5 MP - Q Stylus/Q Stylus+ 5 MP - Q Stylus α | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio B&O Play certified 24-bit/48kHz audio recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio with RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 50% in 36 min 10W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Black, Moroccan Blue, Lavender Violet | New Aurora Black, New Platinum Gray |
| Models | Q710, LM-Q710.FG | LM-V350, LM-V350N |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 350 EUR |
LG Q Stylus
- Integrated Stylus for note-taking and drawing
- Affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Weak processor performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Slow charging speed
LG V35 ThinQ
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 845 processor
- Excellent camera performance with OIS
- Fast charging (18W wired, 10W wireless)
- Higher price compared to the Q Stylus
- May be harder to find new
- No stylus included
Display Comparison
While specific display specs for the Q Stylus are limited, it's likely an IPS LCD panel. The V35 ThinQ features a 6.0-inch OLED display. This difference is significant; OLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors compared to IPS LCD. The V35’s OLED panel also benefits from potentially higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight. The Q Stylus’s display is likely focused on power efficiency rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The LG V35 ThinQ’s camera system is a clear advantage. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the Q Stylus, the V35 boasts a more sophisticated setup, likely including a larger primary sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). OIS is crucial for capturing sharp, blur-free photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. The V35’s image processing algorithms are also more advanced, resulting in better dynamic range and color accuracy. While both phones likely offer standard shooting modes, the V35’s superior hardware and software will deliver noticeably better image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The LG V35 ThinQ’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10nm) is a flagship-level chipset with octa-core Kryo 385 CPUs clocked up to 2.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the LG Q Stylus’s Mediatek MT6750, an octa-core processor with a split core configuration (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53). The Snapdragon 845’s smaller 10nm fabrication process and more powerful core architecture translate to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The V35 also benefits from a more advanced GPU, enabling higher frame rates in graphically intensive games. The Q Stylus will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The LG V35 ThinQ supports 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 3.0 and PD2.0, and even 10W wireless charging, reaching 50% charge in just 36 minutes. The Q Stylus is limited to 10W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the V35’s faster charging capabilities significantly reduce downtime. The Q Stylus will require a longer charging period to reach full capacity, making the V35 a more convenient option for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Q Stylus if you prioritize a built-in stylus for note-taking and basic tasks, and require a smartphone on a very tight budget. You'll accept compromises in performance and camera quality. Buy the LG V35 ThinQ if you demand a responsive user experience, excellent camera capabilities, and the ability to handle demanding applications and games. The V35 is for users who value performance and features over absolute cost savings.